Who decides that they're "profiteering"? You!!
There's nothing wrong with profiting from creating something new. If you don't like it, don't buy it. But arguing that it's OK to steal it because YOU think the creator (or the current copyright owner) is making too much money is ludicrous.
BTW, design patents last up to 14 years and utility and plant patents up to 20 years. But unlike copyrighted material, there is a common good issue involving patents where law makers wanted to eventually allow potentially fundamental concepts to make its way into the public domain to facilitate ongoing innovation. No such argument for copyrights.
There's nothing wrong with profiting from creating something new. If you don't like it, don't buy it. But arguing that it's OK to steal it because YOU think the creator (or the current copyright owner) is making too much money is ludicrous.
BTW, design patents last up to 14 years and utility and plant patents up to 20 years. But unlike copyrighted material, there is a common good issue involving patents where law makers wanted to eventually allow potentially fundamental concepts to make its way into the public domain to facilitate ongoing innovation. No such argument for copyrights.
