Quote from jem:
This is interesting.
Whenever I have had conversations with quants - it seems to me they are doing techinical analysis without charts.
How do you see it being so different.
One guys model seems to be another guys four chartings screens of inter and intra market relationships
Once guys datamines for the reliations of advance decliners and tiki to price, the other guy looks over months of charts.
One guys mean reversion is another guys bollinger or atr bands.
Am I wrong?
Yes and no.
Some elements of "techical analysis" may approximate the methodologies used in quantitative analysis...
The problem is...
That the field of TA is polluted with countless, unfounded beliefs like "pattern repetition", "resistance levels", on and on...
All jacked up by Insatiable Greed and Industry Propaganda.
In 2006... every aspect of TA can be rigorously backtested by a talented 16 year old and debunked...
But no one ever bothers... everything is an article of faith.
After having met 100s of amateur traders... I believe that TA is like crack.
Someone indoctrinated into the "easy money" of TA... can NEVER be deprogrammed.
(There is no such thing as easy money).
Quants only use charts to get a good overview of the situation...
Meaning "chart patterns" are NEVER a basis for a trading decision.
The mathematical techniques used by Quants to find mispriced securities...
Cannot be approximated by "looking at charts."
Also... the ** actual definition ** of "data mining"...
Is to use statistically fallacious techiques to scan mountains of data...
And pull out worthless, random patterns that do not continue into the future.
It is a brilliant con by the Securities Industry to actually re-invent "data mining"...
As a way for a noob to take money away from experienced pro traders.
Basically...
Any Doctoral Stats level expert would dismiss 90% of TA out of hand in 60 seconds...
And not bother to argue with someone who's dog was kidnapped by aliens.
Hope I addressed a few of you points...