You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Reverse Split
- Thread starter gudway
- Start date
I've studied reverse splits for the 1995-2000 ish period (don't remember exact dates).
Majority of companies who reversed split were heading lower before the split and proceeded to continue along with their trajectory after the split.
Usually reverse splits are engineered to get around a threat of delisting because the stock was hammered so badly that it started to flunk the minimum price requirements (it's a formula, so reverse split watchers might want to track that).
Majority of companies who reversed split were heading lower before the split and proceeded to continue along with their trajectory after the split.
Usually reverse splits are engineered to get around a threat of delisting because the stock was hammered so badly that it started to flunk the minimum price requirements (it's a formula, so reverse split watchers might want to track that).
I think there should be a ruling that limits the rev.split
to where the exchange requirement minimum price are met
and not excessively beyond that.
That would give investors a chance to get out at a limited loss
and gives the company a chance to make a SERIOUS effort
to solve their problems.
The way things are right now, there's no room to manouver.
to where the exchange requirement minimum price are met
and not excessively beyond that.
That would give investors a chance to get out at a limited loss
and gives the company a chance to make a SERIOUS effort
to solve their problems.
The way things are right now, there's no room to manouver.