Quote from poipen:
there's no need for indicators.. at all
EDIT: the easiest way to be profitable in forex is to trade pivot points on a 15 min chart
of course this is all my opinion
I only agree somewhat here.
Like you, I use the 15 minute as one of my primary charts, but I do use indicators more for confirmation and divergences as they are lagging indicators.
For example, on the eur/usd, there is a monthly pivot at the 1.367 area. Now supposing price was to shoot up there as MACD histogram, and perhaps volume is decreasing, I might be looking to sell or scale in short in that neck of the woods.
If however we were to have a slow bleed up into that area on steady to increasing volume with MACD histogram rising with price - I would be much more hesitant to trade against that trend.
Either way, indicators can be of use, but mainly for secondary confirmations - price action and location is always the first and foremost indicator - and often that fools most of us.
I know this much - - -the pros work to specific levels of importance. They know, for example, that 1.35 on the eur/usd is a price many traders, including those who are recently short, have their stops 10 pips (plus or minus) above.
Personally, I have no clue when a reversal is coming but I do know that the pro's use round numbers and often will buy into those stops, wipe out as many as possible - up to say 1.36 area - fool traders into thinking price is breaking out, then sell the everloving crap out of it to wipe out all the break out believers.
So even tho 1.35 is a strong pivot, one should not automatically expect price to stop right there - more important is to see what happens at that price, then be prepared to trade accordingly - which often means staying on the sidelines - which is also a position.