Apparently guidelines for ROTH eligibility are not as "tough" given the context of this thread as traditional IRA. However what specifically defines "compensation". With traditional IRA's it has to be in the form of wages, salaries, or bonus. It can not be from dividend income/interest, etc.
Also you folks that are really gung ho on the ROTH. Is the genesis of this view because its "easier" to facilitate given your current trading pursuits and not being eligible for the traditional IRA?
Because unless you plan on having allot of income streams at age 70+ and making lots of money being in a high tax bracket, the ROTH is not all that its cracked up to be.
If you are going to make way more income now and much less when you retire, go with the traditional IRA and reap the present value rewards of tax savings and putting that money to work.
In other words if you are making $75K now, but only plan to draw say or pull down $40K a year between required minimum distributions and social security if its still around when you hit 70, you might want to get out your calculators and do some present value/future value comparisons.
Also you folks that are really gung ho on the ROTH. Is the genesis of this view because its "easier" to facilitate given your current trading pursuits and not being eligible for the traditional IRA?
Because unless you plan on having allot of income streams at age 70+ and making lots of money being in a high tax bracket, the ROTH is not all that its cracked up to be.
If you are going to make way more income now and much less when you retire, go with the traditional IRA and reap the present value rewards of tax savings and putting that money to work.
In other words if you are making $75K now, but only plan to draw say or pull down $40K a year between required minimum distributions and social security if its still around when you hit 70, you might want to get out your calculators and do some present value/future value comparisons.