That would be completely counterproductive. The point of this strategy is I want to get assigned shares. It’s the triple income strategy.
I earn premium by selling cash secured puts at a price I wouldn’t mind going long. Once I get assigned shares, I will sell calls at a higher strike price earning more premium while waiting for an exit. When the shares finally get called away, I’ve made a nice profit from the capital appreciation.
TimtheEnchanter’s post explains it pretty well. My twist on the strategy is to sell very short term and close to the money options hoping for an assignment. But so far the latter part of his post holds true and I am underperforming the SPY. I’m still experimenting with which strike I’m selling the puts at, trying to find that sweet spot where I’ll get assigned shares. My hope is to get assigned shares and take advantage of the mini pull backs in the market while it continues to breach new highs. This is my twist to the strategy that will hopefully lead me to outperform the S&P’s, but so far I have been unsuccessful in doing so.
What if the shares depreciate in value for more than your put and call premium? What if the share price drops below your assignment price aka purchase price, you won't be able to write the call at any higher strikes because the premium will be peanuts then you would be forced to write calls at lower strikes, lower than the purchase price then if the share price subsequently goes up, your shares will be called away at a loss.