Quote from Jack_Larkin:
The issue is more about "what's possible" than "what's happened lately" or "what's probable."
No one in the past has ever been able to predict a failure of a FCM or loss of funds to a segregated account, so it is difficult to choose one that is "safe" based on capitalization. What is "Probable" is that the next failure or theft of funds will also be unexpected.
The best way to protect yourself based on the past, is to choice a well run FCM with NO trading desk. This is the best you can do. I can not think of one situation where the loss of one client caused the loss of another client. I can't think of one situation where an FCM being "small", ha caused that too. Your definition of small seem to be under $100M. In the FCM world, I would consider small under $25M, because they can't do FX trading then.
1245