I am in complete agreement with that. In fact, I was going to further suggest that people's votes (on tax issues especially) should be weighed by their expected contribution to the nation's finances. So, for example, if you're elderly, retired and are not paying taxes, should your vote have the same weight in budget decisions that affect primarily the taxpayers of the next generation? IMHO, the skewed incentives for elderly taxpayers contribute to why Japan finds itself in such an unpleasant fiscal situation.Quote from Lucrum:
You seem to be suggesting that ONLY women should decide female issues such as rape abortion etc.
I merely asked why not/suggested that only tax payers should vote on tax related issues.
Quote from trendlover:
QUOTE]Quote from jem:
This is what he said.
âFirst of all, from what I understand from doctors [pregnancy from rape] is really rare,â
so no thinkers headline is a lie..
Whether his statement is true or not... I have no idea.
[/QUOTE]Oh look I have a klingon (euphemism for dingle-berry) from the vxx thread.Quote from zdreg:
you've come to the wrong chat board. this is the home of all talk no action traders, some of whom post 90%+ to politics and religion thread and the remainder to threads relating to trading.

Quote from Martinghoul:
I am in complete agreement with that. In fact, I was going to further suggest that people's votes (on tax issues especially) should be weighed by their expected contribution to the nation's finances. So, for example, if you're elderly, retired and are not paying taxes, should your vote have the same weight in budget decisions that affect primarily the taxpayers of the next generation? IMHO, the skewed incentives for elderly taxpayers contribute to why Japan finds itself in such an unpleasant fiscal situation.
Quote from Martinghoul:
I am in complete agreement with that. In fact, I was going to further suggest that people's votes (on tax issues especially) should be weighed by their expected contribution to the nation's finances. So, for example, if you're elderly, retired and are not paying taxes, should your vote have the same weight in budget decisions that affect primarily the taxpayers of the next generation? IMHO, the skewed incentives for elderly taxpayers contribute to why Japan finds itself in such an unpleasant fiscal situation.
Quote from CaptainObvious:
OH yea, that will go over big. One persons vote counts for less than another one. :eek: How's about this? If you haven't served in the military, you don't get to vote at all. Since wars are the most costly thing we can vote on, only those who have served can have a valid opinion. I like that one.
Quote from RCG Trader:
You clearly typed that on the fly. Only the military can vote?
Quote from CaptainObvious:
I'm just saying to my conservative friends, if we're going to decide whose vote has more value, the military man/woman goes to the front of the line and every other one the deadbeats that enjoy the freedom they paid no price for can pound sand.