I don't think anyone said otherwise.
The point is there's nothing to lose if he gets acquitted in the Senate of federal charges since no president elect would pursue them once he's out of office, and the State charges would remain regardless.
I don't think anyone said otherwise.
Horrible strategy. You lose all the democrats that are pushing to uphold the rule of law now who'll see it as pure politics. You lose all independents and right wing moderates who'll see it as pure vindictiveness.IMO, I'd only consider impeachment if Trump wins a second term ...
My understanding is that Pelosi thinks there might be political capital to lose among undecided voters if the attempt to impeach is unsuccessful (because of the senate) and then viewed as a partisan maneuver by those undecided voters. So while Trump will get what's coming to him when he's out of office (anyway), the Democrats might step on their own dicks politically in the meantime (i.e., the next election) if it's misinterpreted by a sufficient number of voters.The point is there's nothing to lose if he gets acquitted in the Senate of federal charges since no president elect would pursue them once he's out of office, and the State charges would remain regardless.
My understanding is that Pelosi thinks there might be political capital to lose among undecided voters if the attempt to impeach is unsuccessful (because of the senate) and then viewed as a partisan maneuver by those undecided voters. So while Trump will get what's coming to him when he's out of office (anyway), the Democrats might step on their own dicks politically in the meantime (i.e., the next election) if it's misinterpreted by a sufficient number of voters.
That's how I read Pelosi's calculus of the situation. I could be wrong.
Horrible strategy. You lose all the democrats that are pushing to uphold the rule of law now who'll see it as pure politics. You lose all independents and right wing moderates who'll see it as pure vindictiveness.