The opinions of “Hundreds of former Federal Prosecutors” is not evidence of a crime. The fact a entity “gathered” and published these opinions implies a political motivation.
What CFR did Trump violate, does the violation of this CFR rise to the level of a impeachable offense, and what is the evidence for each of the elements of the charged crime that is required to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law for a finding of “guilty” by a jury.
“Obstruction”, you say? Technically, being late with a response could be considered obstruction. A reasonable test for a legitimate obstruction charge would be: “Did the ‘obstruction’ result in the permanent loss or destruction of significant evidence that prevented the investigators from completing their lawful duties”?
The Steele Dossier, Page and Strock, conflicts of interest, FBI politically timed leaks and actions, FISA issues, evidence of witness tampering, and probable illegal surveillance show political motivation behind this whole investigation initiated by and entity that has a lot to lose if Trump follows through on his promise to “Drain the Swamp”.
As much as the media may love “trial by the press”, their opinions do not have legal effect. Political effect? Yes, unfortunately. This is one of the issues we face as a country is our biased media.
There we have it. A failed two year investigation, not even a prosecution recommendation by the lead investigator no matter how it may be spun, and no specific charges.
No wonder the Democrats can’t talk themselves into impeachment. However, these same Democrats seem to fear Americans are not stupid enough to vote for one of their pathetic candidates or lack of a viable Presidential campaign platform.
Talk about being between a rock and a hard place politically. “We want the power, but the people don’t want us”. (For President, anyway). “Bwah”.