Nonsense again.
They named four African-American voters, including a 100-year-old woman, whose registrations had been challenged or canceled even though they were legally entitled to cast ballots and had voted regularly in recent elections.
The groups said that in at least one county, the targeted voters were disproportionately African-American. Of the roughly 4,500 challenged voters, Judge Biggs said, 3,500 to 4,000 were removed from voting rolls.
Divining the eligibility of voters by monitoring undeliverable mail, a practice commonly called voter caging, is widely seen as an unreliable and even suspect practice. Since 1982, the Republican National Committee and the New Jersey Republican State Committee have operated under a
consent decree allowing a federal judge to review plans for any so-called ballot security program, after they conducted a widespread voter-caging effort in black and Latino neighborhoods.
Some advocacy groups nevertheless use voter caging to combat what they say is voter fraud at polling places, although experts broadly agree that in-person fraud, in which someone impersonates another voter, is all but nonexistent.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/us/north-carolina-voting-rights.html