Republicans Blocks Resolution to Release Mueller Report For The FIFTH time - Cover Up Confirmed

[exGOPer]

always provide citation and always hold yourself to the same standard you demand of others.

i would like to know the source of this and apologies if it is common knowledge.

He always provides citation by asking others to GOOGLE IT! Why won't people research something he just pulled out of his ass!

 

[gwb-trading]

He always provides citation by asking others to GOOGLE IT! Why won't people research something he just pulled out of his ass!

You have been caught .... once again .... blatantly lying.

Provide a source or admit you posted bullshiat.

 

[gwb-trading]

Even though Barr told Congress last week that he’ll soon release a redacted version of Mueller’s report, certain members of Mueller’s team were reportedly disappointed that Barr didn’t release the summary information they prepared for several key sections of the report.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” an official told theWashington Post. The source said the report was prepared in a way that each section “could have been released immediately — or very quickly. It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e9cc6c917de8

Unnamed Mueller team members (who by the way would never comment on this because they would be indicted) commenting on their disappointment that Barr did not include certain sections of the report in his summary is very different than your wholesale claim that Mueller created an redacted version of his report already. He did not and your claim is bullshiat.

 

[exGOPer]

You have been caught .... once again .... blatantly lying.

Provide a source or admit you posted bullshiat.

I literally provided a source on demand, go piss off with your blatant lying. If WaPo isn't a decent source for you then you can go hangout at AlexJones for all I care.

 

[gwb-trading]

I literally provided a source on demand, go piss off with your blatant lying. If WaPo isn't a decent source for you then you can go hangout at AlexJones for all I care.

The Washington Post in NO WAY supports your absurd claim that Mueller already created a redacted version of his report.

 

[exGOPer]

Unnamed Mueller team members (who by the way would never comment on this because they would be indicted) commenting on their disappointment that Barr did not include certain sections of the report in his summary is very different than your wholesale claim that Mueller created an redacted version of his report already. He did not and your claim is bullshiat.

Blah blah blah - this from a guy who quoted fake news conspiracy sites which claimed Bill Clinton raped someone in college.

And if the claim is bullshit then Mueller team would have put out a statement denying it - you are in denial because of your love for your pedo messiah.

 

[exGOPer]

The Washington Post in NO WAY supports your absurd claim that Mueller already created a redacted version of his report.

Can you even read? I even bolded them due to your generic incapability to comprehend anything.

 

[gwb-trading]

And if the claim is bullshit then Mueller team would have put out a statement denying it - you are in denial because of your love for your pedo messiah.

No major media news source has made a claim that Mueller has already created a redacted version of his report. This is purely your personal fantasy.

 

[gwb-trading]

Can you even read? I even bolded them due to your generic incapability to comprehend anything.

They were merely "disappointed that Barr didn’t release the summary information they prepared for several key sections of the report."

This is very different than your claim that Mueller has already created a redacted version of his report. Which is merely your fantasy.

 

[The Futures Farmer]

Even though Barr told Congress last week that he’ll soon release a redacted version of Mueller’s report, certain members of Mueller’s team were reportedly disappointed that Barr didn’t release the summary information they prepared for several key sections of the report.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” an official told theWashington Post. The source said the report was prepared in a way that each section “could have been released immediately — or very quickly. It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e9cc6c917de8

thank you for clearing that up.