Is that correct? It seems bizarre to alllow sex with a 16 year old but make it illegal to send an erotic message to the same person.Quote from james_bond_3rd:
.
Second, they choose to ignore the fact that the law pushed through by Foley etc that all internet explicit messages with minors under the age of 18 are illegal today. When Studds (what a bad name!) was caught in the 80's, there was no law against consensual sex between two people above the age of consent, which was (and still is) 16 in DC. Foley has only himself to blame that what he did violated the law.
c.
