![]()
Current Republicans can't see what scientists saw coming nearly 100 years ago.
90% of engineering is working off of 18th century physics. You think the common folk are going to accept new science?
![]()
Current Republicans can't see what scientists saw coming nearly 100 years ago.
Tell that to this guy
So being that the AGW consensus does not even address man made co2 and being that a consensus is not science...
what could your point have been for citing my quote.
Yes, let's debate science with a moron who cites GatewayPundit.
A debate would also include explanations of all the climate shifts, far worse shifts than we're currently seeing, prior to smoke stacks and the evil humans driving their cars around.1. A Consensus is not science.
2. There is no consensus regarding man made CO2.
That is not a debate. Those are facts.
An example of a debate would be whether the data is showing we are warming outside natural cycles. I would enjoy reading both sides of the debate.
1. A Consensus is not science.
2. There is no consensus regarding man made CO2.
That is not a debate. Those are facts.
An example of a debate would be whether the data is showing we are warming outside natural cycles. I would enjoy reading both sides of the debate.
Lol. No actual replies to what’s correctly noted above.Thanks for all those citations, really helpful.
1. Conservatives are dumb
2. Conservatives have low intellect because of genetic reasons and it's irreversible
That is not a debate. Those are facts.
Science becomes so easy when you are a Conservative. Make declarative statements, cite nothing, claim conspiracies, provide no data while being directly funded by businesses.
Lol. No actual replies to what’s correctly noted above.
What a moronic anti science loser you are.
Because you have zero ability to debate this subject.Which cited scientific argument should I be refuting? All he did was make declarative statements, never cited any papers, never cited any data, never cited his own credentials. If he can do that, why can't I do the same about conservative intellect?