You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Republican Jewish Coalition Bars Ron Paul From Debate: âHeâs misguided and extremeâ
- Thread starter achilles28
- Start date
Quote from Trader666:
Your lack of a moral compass doesn't justify your phony equivalence between terrorism by Islamofascists and military operations of the United States.
Your opinion, as to whether I have a working "moral" compass is noted.
Quote from Trader666:The differences between the two are at least as great as the differences between the way people are treated here versus there. We're so concerned about avoiding collateral damage that we have politically correct rules of engagement that put the lives of our military at risk while the scum you defend deliberately target innocents.
I defended no one. I simply explained my positions calmly, succinctly, and without the ad hominem attacks you seem to prize above all. Might I suggest including a little substance in your next attempt at an argument.
Also, if you truly care about our military, then support the man who receives more donations from them than all other candidates combined, Texas Congressman Ron Paul. He knows how our military should and should not be used, and the troops agree with him. So, if you truly support our troops, Ron Paul is your only choice.
Sure you did with your ridiculous equivalence between Iran and the United States & Israel. Our ROE versus deliberately targeting innocents IS substance to anyone with a brain.
If YOU truly care about our military, YOU wouldn't say they're terrorists. What a fucking hypocrite.
If YOU truly care about our military, YOU wouldn't say they're terrorists. What a fucking hypocrite.
Quote from DAS Trader:
Your opinion, as to whether I have a working "moral" compass is noted.
I defended no one. I simply explained my positions calmly, succinctly, and without the ad hominem attacks you seem to prize above all. Might I suggest including a little substance in your next attempt at an argument.
Also, if you truly care about our military, then support the man who receives more donations from them than all other candidates combined, Texas Congressman Ron Paul. He knows how our military should and should not be used, and the troops agree with him. So, if you truly support our troops, Ron Paul is your only choice.
Quote from Trader666:
[B
If YOU truly care about our military, YOU wouldn't say they're terrorists. What a fucking hypocrite. [/B]
If YOU truly care about our military, you will support Ron Paul. He gets more campaign contributions from active military than all other Republican candidates combined.
The guys actually fighting the battles don't like your neocon forever wars anymore than I do.
Quote from Trader666:
Now you "think" you know more about the Constitution than 8 of 9 Supreme Court Justices who ruled on this.
Spare me your fantasies about bestiality; Section 10 limits the states, moron. And it's the only place in the Constitution where gold and silver are mentioned. Explain why there's NO mention of gold and silver anywhere else. If the Founders were so intent on forbidding Congress they would have done so in Section 9 as well, as they did for example with the prohibition against granting titles of nobility.
Section. 9.
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States
Section. 10.
No State shall... grant any Title of Nobility.
There is nothing in the Constitution that says congress can override Article 1, section 10. Show me the clause where it says they can.
There is nothing terribly extreme about imaging a future Supreme Court ruling mandating legal bestiality. Suppose you were an average American citizen in 1930. Could you have imagined that someday the Supreme Court would rule that abortion must be legal? Or that state courts would rule that homosexual marriage must be legal? Had anybody suggested that to you you would have dismissed him as a lunatic.
Like it or not, one generation's unthinkable possibility becomes some future generation's consensus.
Your isolationist stance is naive and you know nothing about the military, as evidenced by your idiotic claim (among others) that:
Iran owning nukes would take away America's or Israel's option of unilaterally nuking Iran some day
Ron Paul is a joke to almost everyone in the military with a strategic perspective. As of September he had a whopping $37.7K in military donations. Wow!!!!
Iran owning nukes would take away America's or Israel's option of unilaterally nuking Iran some day
Ron Paul is a joke to almost everyone in the military with a strategic perspective. As of September he had a whopping $37.7K in military donations. Wow!!!!
Quote from rew:
No, we shouldn't support either side. I see no reason why the U.S. has to jump into every conflict all over the world and pick sides.
Quote from rew:
If YOU truly care about our military, you will support Ron Paul. He gets more campaign contributions from active military than all other Republican candidates combined.
The guys actually fighting the battles don't like your neocon forever wars anymore than I do.
Of course you have no answer to my question so instead you dwell on bestiality.
AGAIN, explain why there's NO mention of gold and silver other than in Section 10 which limits the states and why, if the Founders were so intent on forbidding Congress, they didn't put it in Section 9 which limits Congress as they did for example with the prohibition against granting titles of nobility which is in BOTH.
Section. 9.
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States
Section. 10.
No State shall... grant any Title of Nobility.
AGAIN, explain why there's NO mention of gold and silver other than in Section 10 which limits the states and why, if the Founders were so intent on forbidding Congress, they didn't put it in Section 9 which limits Congress as they did for example with the prohibition against granting titles of nobility which is in BOTH.
Section. 9.
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States
Section. 10.
No State shall... grant any Title of Nobility.
Quote from rew:
There is nothing in the Constitution that says congress can override Article 1, section 10. Show me the clause where it says they can.
There is nothing terribly extreme about imaging a future Supreme Court ruling mandating legal bestiality. Suppose you were an average American citizen in 1930. Could you have imagined that someday the Supreme Court would rule that abortion must be legal? Or that state courts would rule that homosexual marriage must be legal? Had anybody suggested that to you you would have dismissed him as a lunatic.
Like it or not, one generation's unthinkable possibility becomes some future generation's consensus.
Quote from Trader666:
Of course you have no answer to my question so instead you dwell on bestiality.
AGAIN, explain why there's NO mention of gold and silver other than in Section 10 which limits the states and why, if the Founders were so intent on forbidding Congress, they didn't put it in Section 9 which limits Congress as they did for example with the prohibition against granting titles of nobility which is in BOTH.
Section. 9.
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States
Section. 10.
No State shall... grant any Title of Nobility.
Of course you have no answer to my question, so you dwell on titles of nobility.
Quote from Trader666:
Your isolationist stance is naive and you know nothing about the military, as evidenced by your idiotic claim (among others) that:
Iran owning nukes would take away America's or Israel's option of unilaterally nuking Iran some day
Ron Paul is a joke to almost everyone in the military with a strategic perspective. As of September he had a whopping $37.7K in military donations. Wow!!!!
At least I'm not certifiably insane. Anybody who thinks we have the option of unilaterally nuking an nuclear armed country (i.e., nuking them without risk of getting nuked in return) is crazy.
Your neocon warmonger candidates have gotten much less than $37.7k in military donations -- combined. Yes, those contributions look small compared to the big bucks that come from Wall Street, K Street, or Hollywood. Ordinary soldiers don't get paid a lot.
"Isolationist" is used by the war mongers to label people opposed to war. I will carry that badge with pride.