Republican Jewish Coalition Bars Ron Paul From Debate: ‘He’s misguided and extreme’

[ammo]

Quote from rew:

You could keep your gold in a privately run vault. You could buy and sell the stuff electronically, without ever having to move it. Only the ownership changes. That's how the big guys buy and sell bullion right now. If an Italian bank buys gold from a Swiss bank the gold is likely to stay in a Zurich vault, just the name on the label changes.

There are already small companies, like goldmoney.com, that do this for smaller gold holders. But no nation has yet made gold its currency, and you can't buy from Amazon with gold grams, so the idea hasn't taken off.

It's silly to think that with a gold standard you'd have to haul around several kg of gold to buy a house.

that sounds an awful lot like the bundled mortgages in the caymen islands that they sold several times,no one can trace their title,world wide racketeering,i would vote for that,

 

[Lucrum]

 

[Optional]

Quote from a_person:

Hmm, the logic sounds vaguely familiar...Oh I remember now, those who disagree with the prophet are infidel...and those who disagree with a Mullah's interpretation of a verse in the Koran are traitors and faux muslims... It's pretty sad though if you think about it. Different worlds, different people, different education, different values...and same blind fundamentalism. The limitations of the human brain cross all boundaries.

Wow you are a nut!

 

[Lucrum]

Looking over sections 8 and 10 I interpret it as the states are NOT supposed to coin money. The part about "no state shall... make any thing but gold and silver coins for tender of payments" doesn't seem to mean they can make gold and silver coins, but rather the states aren't suppose to allow or condone the use of anything other than gold and silver coins for tender of payment of debts.

An interpretation itself that could possibly be construed as requiring a gold/silver standard. Even though not specifically mentioned in section 1.




Disclaimer: I've never studied law.

 

[ammo]

Quote from RCG Trader:

Paul would definitely defeat Obama, but he will not get the chance to run. He is being pushed to go third party, but he does know that a divided GOP will not defeat a united Dem party.

And, yet, as some point, someone will have to break away from the two Party system. Paul would take the youth vote from both parties and all the Constitutionalists. The Tea Party and the Occupiers would both choose Paul. Maybe he should run.

The Indies will never support Eye of Newt. Newt will make it close as he will carry all of the South and probably the Mountain West, but the Northeast, Midwest and Pacific West all belong to Obama now.

Mittens had the chance to split the Northeast and Midwest, which would make the South the battleground. This would be dangerous electorially for Obama, because if Mittens were to carry, say, Ohio. Obama would almost have to carry Florida or Texas.

Now, the Southern Strategy is back into full effect. Good luck with that, GOP

repubs don't want this election,thats why newt is on the ballot, thats why sarah palin was the vp last time,if paul wins as a repub ,then the economic falter lands on the repub party,they want him out,but if the dems win,biz goes on as usual, the difference between the two parties is only on paper,media,an excuse for not passing laws,its the dems fault,repubs fault,end result,corruption in the back office,hell they don't even bother to hide it anymore..if paul gets in ,,that machine grinds to a halt

 

[rew]

Quote from a_person:

What kind of gibberish is that? The article says States can't make money (other than gold/silver coins), it does not say states can't use money. They can and they must use money produced by the federal government.



Right...

If I owe a debt to the state (say, my taxes) and the state allows me to pay with federal reserve notes, the state is making that debt payable in a tender other than gold or silver coin. Article I, section 10 says they can't do that. The founding fathers were well aware of the use of paper money. The continental dollar had become worthless as a result of the inflation caused by the Revolutionary War. They did not want to repeat that mistake.

 

[ammo]

Quote from a_person:

As I said in one of my previous posts I kinda agree on both parties, their corruption, the corporate ownership of the entire political spectrum etc. It does not change the fact that Ron Paul is a naive puritanical kook who would make things worse, not better. Life is not black and white and politicians who see everything in black and white tend to fuck things up real bad with their simplistic thinking. Carter and GWB leap immediately to mind but Ron Paul would be in a league of his own.

chicagoans have had the same line of thinking for decades,better to have a crook as mayor because things get done,than have a kook,corruption is all about money and all it did was grow , the corruption and the money,i think the 3 stooges would do a better job,it's just the 3 stooges they put on the ballot every 4 years that can't

 

[rew]

Quote from ammo:

that sounds an awful lot like the bundled mortgages in the caymen islands that they sold several times,no one can trace their title,world wide racketeering,i would vote for that,

The reputable firms that do this have regular independent audits. Sure, fraud is possible. So is fraud in my checking account. Anytime you do anything with your money beyond stuffing it in your mattress you are putting your trust in some sort of financial institution.

Just don't use MF Global.

 

[MarketMasher]

Quote from ammo:

repubs don't want this election,thats why newt is on the ballot, thats why sarah palin was the vp last time,if paul wins as a repub ,then the economic falter lands on the repub party,....

If that's true, then we should nominate the guy who will produce the most fireworks against Obama in the debates. Make him defend everything from executive decision on Libya to trying to have his democrat flunky Tom Miller (AG Iowa) sweep the bank fraud under the rug.

Who would be best to make all the points that need to be made on national tv?

 

[ammo]

Quote from MarketMasher:

If that's true, then we should nominate the guy who will produce the most fireworks against Obama in the debates. Make him defend everything from executive decision on Libya to trying to have his democrat flunky Tom Miller (AG Iowa) sweep the bank fraud under the rug.

Who would be best to make all the points that need to be made on national tv?

Ron Paul, problem is that if you dont have a rep or dem in the whitehouse,once the sheep find out they never needed them, how royally they were getting screwed, the parties will be banished, they will never get it back,they will do everything possible to keep Paul out,, they cannot afford the truth or to dismantle all the inroads they have built