Republican Indianapolis Councilman Jeff Miller Charged With 3 Counts Of Child Molestation
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
It's simple, conservatism has basically become an issue of two things and this is true for conservative movements around the world. First is tribalism, rise of 'white identity' and 'victimhood' is the same as Muslim conservatives complaining about the liberal west, they are afraid of a more diverse world so they stick together and anyone not adhering to the tribe is attacked, their facts or evidence doesn't matter on any issues.
Then there are people who hate taxes and they will go along with any pedophile as long as that agenda is being pushed.
This is conservatism in a nutshell, they are at war so facts from the 'enemy' doesnt matter whatsoever.
I am not arguing moore is not a creep. I am not arguing he did not date young girls.
I am pointing out that the allegation of child molestation is on very questionable foundation.
so we have an asshole like exgopper stating that conservatives are supporting pedos. That is bullshit. That is why I making it clear what we know.
I am pointing out that the allegation of child molestation is on very questionable foundation.
so we have an asshole like exgopper stating that conservatives are supporting pedos. That is bullshit. That is why I making it clear what we know.
Last edited:
Because you are relying on Breitbart for your narrative, try reading the other side too
“As it turns out, in 1999, Ms. Nelson filed a divorce action against her then-husband, Mr. Harris,” Jauregui said Wednesday. “Guess who that case was before? It was filed in Etowah County, and the judge assigned was Roy S. Moore, circuit judge of Etowah County. There was contact.”
There was not contact.
The details of the case were first exposed by a pseudonymous Twitter account, which dug up the documents from that divorce action. ThinkProgress independently verified the full, unredacted case file, which shows there was no occasion for Moore and Nelson to cross paths. The case was dismissed shortly after it was filed as Nelson and her husband attempted to reconcile.
The documents do show that Nelson, then Beverly Harris, filed a divorce action against her then-husband in May of 1999. All of the initial documents, however, were signed by a different district judge, W. D. Russell. On May 25, 1999, Judge Russell scheduled the first hearing for the case for June 16.
But that hearing never took place. In June, before the scheduled hearing was set to take place, she filed for a motion to “continue” (delay) the hearing because she and her husband “are going to counseling and are attempting to reconcile.”
A month later, she filed a motion to dismiss the case. That appears to be the only document Moore signed, and given there was no hearing, there is no reason the divorce action would have required her to enter the courthouse or have contact with Moore.
Moore’s attorney acknowledged that he didn’t even personally sign this document. Rather, it was a routine filing where his name was stamped by an assistant. Nelson did eventually file for divorce again, but it was five years later, and a different judge, District Judge Donald W. Stewart, oversaw and signed the final divorce papers.
The only explanation for Jauregui claiming “there was contact” between Moore and Nelson because of this divorce action is to undermine Nelson’s credibility. In doing so, he only further undermined Moore’s.
Nelson’s attorney, Gloria Allred, released a statement after the press conference Wednesday indicating that they would agree to allow the yearbook to be examined by “an independent expert or experts,” but only after a U.S. Senate committee agrees to conduct a hearing into the accusations about Moore. Nelson is willing to testify under oath before the Senate regarding her allegations.
https://thinkprogress.org/roy-moore-beverly-nelson-divorce-2aeaeeb17ce9/
your facts support the idea that the women had a copy of the stamped signature with D.A. written next to it by Moore's clerk of secretary.
Its seems very very unlikely Moore would have signed her yearbook with D. A after his name. D.A was his clerks initials indicating who stamped moores name.
So unless other facts show up... you don't really have solid grounds to call him a child molester.
and you are an asshole to keep saying that conservatives support child molesters. As I stated earlier I reserved judgement on this until more facts came out.
I would not vote for a child molester and I am sure the vast majority of americans agree.
Its seems very very unlikely Moore would have signed her yearbook with D. A after his name. D.A was his clerks initials indicating who stamped moores name.
So unless other facts show up... you don't really have solid grounds to call him a child molester.
and you are an asshole to keep saying that conservatives support child molesters. As I stated earlier I reserved judgement on this until more facts came out.
I would not vote for a child molester and I am sure the vast majority of americans agree.