I've lost a lot of respect for Fox News over the way they've treated Paul, both this cycle and in the '08 cycle.
I think the characterization that he was ignored for the first 40 minutes, then hit with posionous questions is exactly right. Certainly it was my reaction, and I'm not some wide-eyed Paul cultist.
I'm also beginning to have a lot less respect for republican primary voters. Are people in SC so dumb and so easily brainwashed that they actually believe our troops are accomplishing something worthwhile in Afghanistan? That they are "protecting our freedoms", to use one of Bush's idiotic and annoying catch phrases.
I get it that conservatives want the US to have a strong defense. I certainly do. Since we already spend more on defense than the rest of the world combined, maybe we need to rethink the whole issue. Is our defense made stronger or weaker by getting bogged down in 10 year nation-bulding exercises in Medieval hellholes like afghanistan? I just read an analysis that argued we would need to extend enormous financial support to that country until 2024, something in the order of $10 bill a year. Or risk seeing all our "accomplishments" collapse.
To me, that says more about how misguided our strategy is than anything else. Somehow we attacked them for sheltering bin Ladin and that obligates us to make them the friggin' 51st state? I don't get it and I would really like to hear some of those idiots who booed Paul explain it.
The biggest threat to our actual country is the wide open border. The next biggest is from muslim immigration. Very un-PC, but everyone knows it's true.