Reporter roughed up outside Coakley fund-raiser

[drjekyllus]

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view.bg?articleid=1225332


"A Weekly Standard reporter says he was roughed up last night outside a Washington, D.C. fund-raiser for Attorney General Martha Coakley by someone he believes is associated with her U.S. Senate campaign.

John McCormack, the magazine’s deputy online editor, writes about the incident outside the Sonoma restaurant in an online dispatch entitled: “We Report, We Get Pushed.”

According to McCormack’s account, Coakley took two questions from reporters after the event, but declined to respond to his question. McCormack wrote he asked Coakley whether she stood by statements she made during Monday’s debate about terrorists in Afghanistan."





All we needed to do was put these goons in charge and their true nature was exposed. This is how you dodge the tough questions if you are a leftists.

 

[Ricter]

Wait a minute, I thought leftists were wimps, I thought they couldn't run anything. So how can they be goons, or in charge?

Perhaps leftists are just what you need them to be, depending on the point of view you are trying to express at the moment?

 

[drjekyllus]

Quote from Ricter:

Wait a minute, I thought leftists were wimps, I thought they couldn't run anything. So how can they be goons, or in charge?

Perhaps leftists are just what you need them to be, depending on the point of view you are trying to express at the moment?

Huh? Dude, you have some screwed up logic. We have seen the death of hundreds of millions of people at the hands of leftists.

 

[Ricter]

No, we have seen the death of hundreds of millions at the hands of soldiers.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from drjekyllus:

Huh? Dude, you have some screwed up logic. We have seen the death of hundreds of millions of people at the hands of leftists.

That makes for great White House Christmas tree ornaments though!

 

[drjekyllus]

Quote from Ricter:

No, we have seen the death of hundreds of millions at the hands of soldiers.

Lets see.

Stalin, leftist.
Hitler, leftist.
Castro, leftist.
Pol Pot, leftist.
Mugabe, leftist.
Mao, leftist.


The list goes on and on. Its someone else's fault, isn't it Ricter?

 

[Ricter]

Quote from drjekyllus:

Lets see.

Stalin, leftist.
Hitler, leftist.
Castro, leftist.
Pol Pot, leftist.
Mugabe, leftist.
Mao, leftist.


The list goes on and on. Its someone else's fault, isn't it Ricter?

There is so much self-serving confusion in there it's nearly hopeless to even start on it. You are lost in politics vs. economics, and history.

At any rate, how many will your own people, the muslims, eventually kill? And if you're no longer in your homeland, but are uselessly posting from the US some 50 times a day, then you really are more part of the problem, aren't you?

Where's your anger come from? Is it the disrespect you get from having black hair and brown skin, and a foreigner's accent, here in the good old USA, a country where you're not wanted by the group you most support, the right?

 

[drjekyllus]

Quote from Ricter:

There is so much self-serving confusion in there it's nearly hopeless to even start on it. You are lost in politics vs. economics, and history.

At any rate, how many will your own people, the muslims, eventually kill? And if you're no longer in your homeland, but are uselessly posting from the US some 50 times a day, then you really are more part of the problem, aren't you?

Where's your anger come from? Is it the disrespect you get from having black hair and brown skin, and a foreigner's accent, here in the good old USA, a country where you're not wanted by the group you most support, the right?

When did I become a Muslim, you stupid idiot? What anger are you refering to? What foreign accent are you refereing to? It is great to see that you have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Interesting question. If leftists are such wimps, why all the violence? Easy answer though.

There are two basic wings of modern radical leftism, or "progressives" as they prefer to be called to hide their true intentions. One is the psuedo-intellectual wing, represented by the media, Hollywood and university activists. They are the wimps. One need only watch Obama's pathetic girl toss of the ceremonial first pitch of the All Star game to realize this.

The other wing is their muscle. Union goons, ACORN thugs, black muslims and new black panther predators (like the thugs that were intimidating people outside the Philadelphia polling station, only to be let off by the Obama's AG Eric Holder), environmentalist and animal rights terrorists and the motley crew of marxist/anti capitalist/anti-globalist mobs that seem to come out of the woodwork.

While the first group has as little contact as possible with the second, they do use their power to fund them with govenrment grants and protect them and prevent them from being held accountable for their lawlessness.

 

[loik]

Quote from drjekyllus:

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view.bg?articleid=1225332


"A Weekly Standard reporter says he was roughed up last night outside a Washington, D.C. fund-raiser for Attorney General Martha Coakley by someone he believes is associated with her U.S. Senate campaign.

John McCormack, the magazine’s deputy online editor, writes about the incident outside the Sonoma restaurant in an online dispatch entitled: “We Report, We Get Pushed.”

According to McCormack’s account, Coakley took two questions from reporters after the event, but declined to respond to his question. McCormack wrote he asked Coakley whether she stood by statements she made during Monday’s debate about terrorists in Afghanistan."





All we needed to do was put these goons in charge and their true nature was exposed. This is how you dodge the tough questions if you are a leftists.

Why not refer to them as statists or authoritarian?