Reporter Refused to Put Name on Hunter Biden Story

It must be amazing to make shit up and call it ‘factual’. It takes a special kind of delusion.


You are calling it factual, I clearly communicated this is my sincere belief.

Dumb cunt you are ;)

You will burn I'm sure fella. Maybe me too but you for sure.
 

Rudy Giuliani doesn’t understand Twitter or the internet.

It’s embarrassing enough that Giuliani inadvertently tweeted a link to a website criticizing Trump, but now he is doubling down on cyberstupidity by claiming that “Twitter allowed someone to invade my text with a disgusting anti-President message.”

Ignorant as to what had happened, he latched on to apparent anti-Republican bias within Twitter, a theme that Trump and other Republicans have pushed despite no evidence.

“Don’t tell me they are not committed cardcarrying anti-Trumpers,” added Giuliani, who — we repeat — is a cybersecurity adviser to the White House

https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/04/rudy-giuliani-doesnt-understand-the-internet/
Yeah but I 'named that firm' didn't I?
Think he runs that by himself? :banghead: :rolleyes:

-never argue with the great and all knowing VZ.
 
Maybe nobody wanted the byline because all of the shit that would come their way, especially if the knew the story was accurate.
 
Maybe nobody wanted the byline because all of the shit that would come their way, especially if the knew the story was accurate.

So the solution is to assign byline to people who didn't contribute to the story and didn't knew that they were attributed?

Why won't anyone want credit for an accurate story?
 
So the solution is to assign byline to people who didn't contribute to the story and didn't knew that they were attributed?

Why won't anyone want credit for an accurate story?

I told you why! They don't want to deal with people like you or worse.

When a reporter comes up with a Trump story, true or not, they are built up and literally worshipped.

Story reported on Biden, they are called propagandists, shills, liars, Russian stooges
 
I told you why! They don't want to deal with people like you or worse.

People like me who would want to read the actual emails instead of a screenshot made in photoshop? At least with wikileaks, they dumped all the emails, Ghouliani and NYPost won't even do that, won't even let AP take a look at the emails. Why?

When a reporter comes up with a Trump story, true or not, they are built up and literally worshipped.

All depends on reputation of the news outlet, NYPost is a tabloid who consistently get stories wrong.

Story reported on Biden, they are called propagandists, shills, liars, Russian stooges

Ghouliani admitted to working with Russian spies and he gave the 'laptop' to NYpost who refuse to show it to anyone else to verify, why won't the story be suspect? Even Fox News refused to touch it.
 
People like me who would want to read the actual emails instead of a screenshot made in photoshop? At least with wikileaks, they dumped all the emails, Ghouliani and NYPost won't even do that, won't even let AP take a look at the emails. Why?



All depends on reputation of the news outlet, NYPost is a tabloid who consistently get stories wrong.



Ghouliani admitted to working with Russian spies and he gave the 'laptop' to NYpost who refuse to show it to anyone else to verify, why won't the story be suspect? Even Fox News refused to touch it.
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what 'moving averages' are. You threw me on that one. Is that a stock thing?
 
I'm still waiting for you to tell me what 'moving averages' are. You threw me on that one. Is that a stock thing?

I saw a chart you posted, looked like something you screenshotted from some web based charting app. That's a dead give away of one's trading skills.
 
Back
Top