Report: US could destroy North Korea's nuclear site this weekend

That means it should be South Korea. Rather than the US, China, North Korea or anyone else.

Yes and no. Yes, unless we feel we are in jeopardy of a nuke attack. At that point, we will decide the appropriate action. What we are seeing is that the military feels we are much closer to that point than any of us realized.
 
To be fair, imo, the nation which could encounter most damages among all nations in case of any serious war in the Korean Peninsula should have the strongest saying during this period of time.

That means it should be South Korea. Rather than the US, China, North Korea or anyone else.


S Korea is kind of dysfunctional right now,they don't have a real President.



http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-north-korea-options-2017-4


If Trump wants to take military action against North Korea, he may have to do it this month

  • Apr. 5, 2017, 10:30 AM
President Donald Trump has made it very clear that when he meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday, one topic will tower above the rest: North Korea's nuclear posturing.

But Trump, whose administration has gone further than any before it in stressing the potential for a military strike on North Korea, may be running out of time to determine North Korea's fate on his own terms.

As North Korea continues to test nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, the US nears a "point of no return," Omar Lamrani, a senior military analyst at Stratfor, a geopolitical analysis firm, told Business Insider.

Essentially, once North Korea's military perfects an intercontinental ballistic missile that can strike the US mainland, the US would no longer be able to launch a preemptive military attack without fear of casualties at home, and it may then consider recognizing North Korea's Kim Jong Un for the first time as a legitimate world leader.

But perfecting an ICBM could take years, and South Korean politics could freeze Trump out of the conversation long before then.

"If the Trump administration is hell-bent on significantly stepping up pressure on China and North Korea, it's going to have a serious problem," Joel Wit, a former State Department diplomat who cofounded 38North, a website that brings together experts on North Korea, told Business Insider.

That problem's name is Moon Jae-in, a liberal South Korean human-rights lawyer who is favored to win the country's May 9 presidential election.

"He is going to pursue a very different approach from President Park," Wit said, referring to Park Guen-hye, South Korea's conservative former president who was recently impeached and arrested after a bizarre influence-peddling scheme came to light.

Wit said the normally ironclad alliance between the US and South Korea could be rocked by a reversal by Moon on policy toward North Korea. Moon is expected to pursue some kind of diplomacy with North Korea, a strategy that has been attempted previously in the past-quarter century to no success.

This couldn't contrast any more with public stances from officials in the Trump administration that the"clock has now run out" on Pyongyang and"the United States has spoken enough about North Korea."

Wit said the clash in objectives for North Korea would create "problems that the Chinese can take advantage of," further relegating the US to the sidelines without the North making a single concession.

So if Trump can't convince Xi he's on the brink of war with North Korea and muscle out some concessions, he's looking at about a one-month window in which he could act unilaterally, before possible responses go from bad to worse.
 
Yes and no. Yes, unless we feel we are in jeopardy of a nuke attack. At that point, we will decide the appropriate action. What we are seeing is that the military feels we are much closer to that point than any of us realized.

My point about strongest saying was actually meaning that the South Korea, based on the reason of potential damages as mentioned, should have said very strongly something useful in a way requesting the North Korea to stop/postpone the upcoming test, at least for now, and start again talking rationally to other countries for a peace deal, that could ensure the economic growth, life style guarantee, unification possibility, etc.

Of course, with the assistance and backing from China, Russia, Malaysia, etc.

Perhaps this is the best timing for Trump making a really big deal with Kim.

330px-Kim_ok.jpg
U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen, left, meets with Jo Myong Rok, second from right, first vice-chairman of North Korea's National Defense Commission, 11 October 2000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea

Korean reunification
Main article: Korean reunification

North Korea's policy is to seek reunification without what it sees as outside interference, through a federal structure retaining each side's leadership and systems. In 2000, both North and South Korea signed the June 15th North–South Joint Declaration in which both sides made promises to seek out a peaceful reunification.[145] The Democratic Federal Republic of Korea is a proposed state first mentioned by then North Korean president Kim Il-sung on 10 October 1980, proposing a federation between North and South Korea in which the respective political systems would initially remain.[146]
 
S Korea is kind of dysfunctional right now,they don't have a real President.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-north-korea-options-2017-4

South Korea or the parliament leaders may request Trump's bombing should wait until their new president is elected.

China could also suggest North Korea to postpone the test after the upcoming election.

Then Trump's response would be agreeable, provided North Korea starts to arrange a new peace talk once South Korea having a president-elect.

Nothing is impossible! LOL
 
South Korea or the parliament leaders may request Trump's bombing should wait until their new president is elected.

China could also suggest North Korea to postpone the test after the upcoming election.

Then Trump's response would be agreeable, provided North Korea starts to arrange a new peace talk once South Korea having a president-elect.

Nothing is impossible! LOL


LOL !!!!
 
Nuclear weapons the ‘biggest threat facing humans today’

THE threat looms large with North Korea celebrating the birthday of Kim Il-sung and Donald Trump poised for a preemptive attack. Here’s how it could look.

April 15, 2017

http://www.news.com.au/technology/s...y/news-story/4a77b51c9f264397e4144e86d680bef3

He questioned how an underground nuclear test facility could be attacked but said there are a lot of reasons as to why this scenario should be avoided at any cost.

“Not that the DPRK would ultimately win a conflict with the US — it clearly would be levelled,” he said.

But he warned before the DPRK was levelled it might be able to carry out a massive conventional attack on Seoul or carry out nuclear strikes on other targets within roughly 1500km.

“These, should the DPRK be able to successfully and accurately launch its missiles as distinct from having them blow up on launch, would be roughly Hiroshima-size warheads (10-20Kt),” he said.

“But employed against cities such as Shanghai, Beijing or Tokyo would still rack up a body — count of 100,000-500,000, depending on the fusing characteristics of the warhead.”

The consequences would be disastrous.

“What would happen next would be the incineration of the DPRK by the US or maybe China, with a body count in the millions or tens of millions, and with the fallout drifting over South Korea, China, and Japan,” Mr Hallam said.
 
Back
Top