It's nothing new, these are the Nader and Jill Stein supporters who believe in conspiracies and are just as dumb as your average Breitbart reader.
Report: Mueller Partners With New York Attorney General To Investigate Manafort
- Thread starter Spike Trader
- Start date
It's nothing new, these are the Nader and Jill Stein supporters who believe in conspiracies and are just as dumb as your average Breitbart reader.
In which case you would think that they would vote for Jill Stein.
It's lack of strategic voting that I am pointing out, even many libertarians who bitch and moan about Republicans vote R when it comes time for elections that matter, not these nimrods who know only to whine and appeal to purity.
It's more than I would want to try to unpack in posts, but in general there are special counsels occuring under existing statutes which specify when and where conflicts exist suggesting/requiring that special counsel should be appointed. Then there are special prosecutors versus special counsels which are different although one may evolve from the other. And then there are special counsels arrising from congress for special events- ie. lewinksy clinton. And then there are special counsel or special prosecutors arising under the ethics language and regulations at the agency level. So you cannot just put them all in a shake n bake bag and treat them as one.
In general or rather-to be specific- Both Comey the Clown and Loretta had conflicts of interest such that the justice department should have appointed a special counsel/investigator under the terms of their own regulations because the justice department as a whole was conflicted because everyone worked for Loretta and she had a direct and extremely personal and professional interest in not seeing hillary prosecuted. If Hillary were prosecuted she most likely lose the election and trump would remove Loretta with 100% certainty. Loretta conflict of interest could not have been more direct.
Mueller the Clown, on the other hand violates the provisions of the special counsel act which specifically says that the special counsel/investigator shall not have a personal relationship with any of the primary defendants or witnesses. However it is well established and both Mueller the Clown and Comey the Clown openly state that they had a longstanding mentor/mentee relationship- and yet Comey is one of central players in the whole thing. Not only in testifying against trump on his alleged interference- but also there are or potentially are reasons why Comey should also be prosecuted. Mueller is biased all the way and throughout in regard to those issues based on his personal relationship with Comey- a clear violation of the special counsel state.
A witch hunt for Trump
Another pass for Hillary and Comey the Clown and Loretta.
Last edited:
GOP senators: Comey drafted statement clearing Clinton before her interview
Former FBI Director James Comey began drafting a statement rejecting the idea of criminal charges against Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her private email account about two months or more before Clinton was interviewed in the FBI probe, according to partial transcripts of interviews released Thursday by two Republican senators.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham said they obtained the transcripts from the Office of Special Counsel, a government watchdog agency that launched an investigation into whether Comey's actions violated a federal law against government employees engaging in political activity while on duty.
In a letter sent Wednesday to Comey's successor, FBI Director Christopher Wray, Grassley and Graham said Comey's move to start preparing the statement sometime in April or early May reflected a premature conclusion that Clinton shouldn't be charged.
"Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy," Grassley and Graham wrote as they demanded all FBI records of the drafts Comey prepared as well as other materials related to the OSC probe.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/31/fbi-comey-clinton-email-242213
Former FBI Director James Comey began drafting a statement rejecting the idea of criminal charges against Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton over her private email account about two months or more before Clinton was interviewed in the FBI probe, according to partial transcripts of interviews released Thursday by two Republican senators.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and Sen. Lindsey Graham said they obtained the transcripts from the Office of Special Counsel, a government watchdog agency that launched an investigation into whether Comey's actions violated a federal law against government employees engaging in political activity while on duty.
In a letter sent Wednesday to Comey's successor, FBI Director Christopher Wray, Grassley and Graham said Comey's move to start preparing the statement sometime in April or early May reflected a premature conclusion that Clinton shouldn't be charged.
"Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation. The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy," Grassley and Graham wrote as they demanded all FBI records of the drafts Comey prepared as well as other materials related to the OSC probe.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/31/fbi-comey-clinton-email-242213
OK. Others may not see it the same way, but OK.
I have no problem with this, so long as Comey is given an opportunity to answer to the innuendo implied by his beginning to draft a statement before the investigation was concluded.
Most stayed home or voted for Stein rather than voted for Trump.Stein got a million more votes in 2016 than she got in 2012 and black turn out was less for Hillary.Some white libs just didn't like Hillary and stayed home.The far left was not voting for Trump.