Repeatedly banned racist troll NY Hood spamming the forum with the same threads over and over again.

Tony Stark said:
View attachment 297898

...
More...

I am not arguing the definition of racist. I am simply arguing that by Magna's definition of racist, IV has not broken Magna's rule of a racist post. Common sense indicates that yes, IV is posting nasty stuff about blacks that are racist in nature, because they are derogatory against blacks, based on the standard definitions of the term.

That is all I am saying. I am so supreme court material in logic it boggles the mind. Like Ginsburg and the hot-dog debate.

 
Overnight said:
I am not arguing the definition of racist. I am simply arguing that by Magna's definition of racist, IV has not broken Magna's rule of a racist post. Common sense indicates that yes, IV is posting nasty stuff about blacks that are racist in nature, because they are derogatory against blacks, based on the standard definitions of the term.

That is all I am saying. I am so supreme court material in logic it boggles the mind. Like Ginsburg and the hot-dog debate.

More...

I didn't accuse him of racist posts in this thread.Hes toned it down after being banned more times than I can count and use code words like thugs for blacks.I just said he is the racist troll NY Hood.

This thread is about him spamming the forum with the same threads over and over again.
 
Tony Stark said:
I didn't accuse him of racist posts in this thread.Hes toned it down after being banned more times than I can count and use code words like thugs for blacks.I just said he is the racist troll NY Hood.

This thread is about him spamming the forum with the same threads over and over again.
More...

Tony, if you don't like his posts why don't you put him on ignore?
 
FortuneTeller said:
Tony, if you don't like his posts why don't you put him on ignore?
More...

Maybe he is a balls-to-the-walls user like me who does not believe in /ignore. I don't hide behind ignore so I cannot see a post that offends me. If I see a post that offends me, I simply unsee it in my head and walk away from it, or challenge the user who posted it, and we may get into a tussle. What inevitably happens in those cases is that I win the discussion, because the butt-hurt user puts me on /ignore because they cannot stand the fact that they have no more ammo to rebutt the original point they were trying to make.

Out-of-sight, out-of-mind mentality. It is so childish.
 
Overnight said:
Maybe he is a balls-to-the-walls user like me who does not believe in /ignore. I don't hide behind ignore so I cannot see a post that offends me. If I see a post that offends me, I simply unsee it in my head and walk away from it, or challenge the user who posted it, and we may get into a tussle. What inevitably happens in those cases is that I win the discussion, because the butt-hurt user puts me on /ignore because they cannot stand the fact that they have no more ammo to rebutt the original point they were trying to make.

Out-of-sight, out-of-mind mentality. It is so childish.
More...

Yeah, I have taken some posters off ignore lately because I just don't want to argue like I used to, and I do like to read their posts. I used to argue a ton and it doesn't help anyone to argue things to the death.
 
FortuneTeller said:
So, you believe him to be a racist and that does not meet your standards? What else does he have to do in order to meet your standards?
More...


I would ask why do you defend racists like NY Hood but considering you were banned for a week for racists posts I already know.

I also didn't put you on ignore for being a racist.
 
FortuneTeller said:
...and I do like to read their posts. I used to argue a ton and it doesn't help anyone to argue things to the death.
More...

Sounds like you are maturing as a forum user then. That is exactly the track to take!

If you like to read users' posts, you do not ignore them with a hard command when they offend you in a few. You simply bite your lip, move on, come back later and revisit it! This is how Usenet works. In Usenet, everybody can hear you scream, because there is no /ignore /block. :)
 
Tony Stark said:
I would ask why do you defend racists like NY Hood but considering you were banned for a week for racists posts I already know.
More...

You must be losing your mind. When have I defended NY Hood or any racist (if there are any in the first place here) at ET? And I was never banned a week for racist posts, you are imagining things again like you always do.

I know why you don't put him on ignore. Because you love arguing with him and others here at ET. That's why.
 
Tony Stark said:
I would ask why do you defend racists like NY Hood but considering you were banned for a week for racists posts I already know.

I also didn't put you on ignore for being a racist.
More...

Ha, you did an edit after I replied to you. You are the racist on this board and you are also a race baiter. That is why YOU have been banned for a week here. LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top