Quote from stu:
Not true. On one side the theist has miracles magic superstition and imaginary beings to answer the question. On the other ,science has facts knowledge information which suggest and predict particular possible answers to the question.
Science is fact without conclusion. Religion conclusion without fact.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from cashcow
Indeed. Well said. At last, someone with a functioning brain.
-1 Are you serious? Ignoring stu's general incapabilities to thnk outside a paper bag (he is on ignore as he constantly proved himself to be incapable of holding the other side of an argument, but I have to see his mindless assertions in other people's quotes)
Perhaps you can then explain why science has basically resorted to 11-plus dimensional space and multiverse (multiple to infinite universes), plus dark energy and dark matter to try and explain things, when some to all of these may never be proven, may be later discarded, and the entire thing is pretty much unobservable at this point?
Science is a framework of HYPOTHESIS, HELD FACTS and EVIDENCES held in the form of paradigms (one of his many nongrasps of true science) based on current understanding and knowledge, subject to later revisions, deletions, and additions. And such happens almost every minute of every day, somewhere in the world. Science is a phenomenal tool and human achievement, but Stu waves it as a 3-year old brandishes a hand grenade.
Religion is faith and belief based on a cultural/historic traditions in many different societies, that holds the people together and is generally how they frame the world and the observable universe.
And atheism is a completely unfounded assertion, that can never be proven, and is held by people who usually have little grasp of the underlying sciences they keep pointing to, and anger management problems because they cannot stand that anyone happens to disagree with something that is entirely based on opinion, beliefs and whiny rants.
Not true. On one side the theist has miracles magic superstition and imaginary beings to answer the question. On the other ,science has facts knowledge information which suggest and predict particular possible answers to the question.
Science is fact without conclusion. Religion conclusion without fact.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from cashcow
Indeed. Well said. At last, someone with a functioning brain.
-1 Are you serious? Ignoring stu's general incapabilities to thnk outside a paper bag (he is on ignore as he constantly proved himself to be incapable of holding the other side of an argument, but I have to see his mindless assertions in other people's quotes)
Perhaps you can then explain why science has basically resorted to 11-plus dimensional space and multiverse (multiple to infinite universes), plus dark energy and dark matter to try and explain things, when some to all of these may never be proven, may be later discarded, and the entire thing is pretty much unobservable at this point?
Science is a framework of HYPOTHESIS, HELD FACTS and EVIDENCES held in the form of paradigms (one of his many nongrasps of true science) based on current understanding and knowledge, subject to later revisions, deletions, and additions. And such happens almost every minute of every day, somewhere in the world. Science is a phenomenal tool and human achievement, but Stu waves it as a 3-year old brandishes a hand grenade.
Religion is faith and belief based on a cultural/historic traditions in many different societies, that holds the people together and is generally how they frame the world and the observable universe.
And atheism is a completely unfounded assertion, that can never be proven, and is held by people who usually have little grasp of the underlying sciences they keep pointing to, and anger management problems because they cannot stand that anyone happens to disagree with something that is entirely based on opinion, beliefs and whiny rants.