evidence that is tested is not subjective. try to use your brain for a once instead of your emotions.
Edith Sitwell: I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Religion is a hypothesis.
- Thread starter walter4
- Start date
Edith Sitwell: I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it.
Quote from vhehn:
do you accept that because they felt it we should accept their feelings as fact or should more knowledgable people challenge them to prove it on public forums?
I accept it because I cannot refute it.
Not sure what you do for a living, but (among other things) I manage people. And I can't do a good job of that using your scientific reductionism and trying to take away my people's comforts like their gods, their pets, or their ice cream, even if those things might not be very good for them.
In the time you wrote the post below, you could have easily have given an answer...
Quote from Gabfly1:
Yeah, that's it. That's why I don't wish to continue an exchange with a disingenuous person who argues in circles when it suits him. Despite the fact that feeding you with fodder for your artistic license is such a meaningful way to spend time.
You are claiming I was evading, I am asking for your supporting evidence, or just simply restate the question...
Or are you evading asking the question again?
Or are you evading asking the question again?
Quote from Ricter:
The question, the discussion, just water under the bridge now. I merely noted then that, backed into a corner, you began evading, which is what you just accused Gabfly of doing.
Quote from Gabfly1:
...Despite the fact that feeding you with fodder for your licentia poetica is such a meaningful way to spend time.
True, but then this also applies, albeit to a lesser extent, to so many other trolls here who argue just for the sake of arguing and don't take time to read, digest and comprehend material before embarking on their next blind, rage induced foray. Having the last word is priority. Alas, the circular path. So tedious and tiresome. Needless to say, a majority of these discussions eventually dissipate and disintegrate into vitriolic and abusive personal attacks. Obviously, clear thinking and largesse are scarce commodities here.
Watching from the sidelines makes for excellent entertainment though, except for the spherical circuits.
So that you could pervert it with your self-serving interpretation as you did my previous comment? Did you miss the part about my not wanting to participate in your artistic license and merry-go-round logic? I had already stated my position earlier. I have little use for your follow-up "Did you stop beating your wife" style of questioning. Since (your) circular logic is never-ending, someone has to get off the ride first. That'll be me.Quote from OPTIONAL777:
In the time you wrote the post below, you could have easily have given an answer...
So you are fearful of answering the question...
Quote from Gabfly1:
So that you could pervert it with your self-serving interpretation as you did my previous comment? Did you miss the part about my not wanting to participate in your artistic license and merry-go-round logic? I had already stated my position earlier. I have little use for your follow-up "Did you stop beating your wife" style of questioning. Since (your) circular logic is never-ending, someone has to get off the ride first. That'll be me.