As to what may be truth, your credibility is shot by the things you state but are obviously determined to understand nothing about.
stu, the self appointed judge of credibility...
If that is not the surest example of hubris to the nth degree...
...as well as someone who cannot simply show where someone is wrong, but needs to tell them off without proving the point...
stu, the self appointed judge of credibility...
If that is not the surest example of hubris to the nth degree...
...as well as someone who cannot simply show where someone is wrong, but needs to tell them off without proving the point...
Quote from stu:
You are either suggesting the existence of the Universe is in question OR how the Universe came into existence is in question.
Which is it?
There is evidence the Universe exists. There is no such evidence God exists.
You haven't yet determined nor have you apparently understood the difference in how the Universe exists and God doesn't, yet, you are evidently conceited enough to presume to know scientists are "dismayed" and are discovering "nothingness".
As to what may be truth, your credibility is shot by the things you state but are obviously determined to understand nothing about.
Which is exactly what religion teaches you to do.
feel a clear need to try reply to nearly every post I make to defend all your absurdity.