Relating Evolution and Intelligent Design

[jem]

Quote from stu:

no jem, I don't do that. You are less coherent than "a wack job atheist".

So you now agree you can not prove there is no god.

Therefore science is not on the side of the atheist.

 

[Thunderdog]

I think the greater challenge, on balance, is relating intelligence to the belief in "Intelligent Design."

 

[Thunderdog]

Quote from jem:

So you now agree you can not prove there is no god.

Therefore science is not on the side of the atheist.

Give it up, jem. You can't just pull an inherently unprovable theory out of your ass and claim it stands up to scrutiny. There is a pecking order when it comes to hypotheses and their available supporting evidence. Yours is at the back of the line. Take a number.

 

[jem]

Quote from Thunderdog:

Give it up, jem. You can't just pull an inherently unprovable theory out of your ass and claim it stands up to scrutiny. There is a pecking order when it comes to hypotheses and their available supporting evidence. Yours is at the back of the line. Take a number.

another illogical response.

What prompts you to look at my statement to stu argue I have an unprovable theory.

My statement does not presuppose any theory other than Stu and argue Science not being able to prove there is no God.

 

[I am...]

Quote from Thunderdog:

I think the greater challenge, on balance, is relating intelligence to the belief in "Intelligent Design."

When the desire for what is not true overrides reason, intelligence is used to create fantasy. As such, the mind that makes the world is intelligent, even ingenious. It does accomplish its objectives, rather perfectly. The world is designed to deny Self, enabling dreamers to be something else entirely, utterly obscuring true genesis. As such, the genesis of the world is yet uncertain...by design. By this measure, the mind is worthy of applaud. It successfully masks the fact that YOU are the maker of the mind that designs to deny thy Self by means of "the universe".

Christ!

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

When I tell you that science proves there is a Creator (without any proof) - then you call put me in the same whack job category as atheists.

So you now agree you can not prove there is no god.

Therefore science is not on the side of the atheist.

What I agree is proven jem is, whether you like it or not , in certain respects you are atheist and it remains that you still have a lost less coherence in your unintelligent rebuttals than any "atheist wack job" I've ever heard.

 

[seneca_roman]

for entertainment only:

Seneca

 

[volente_00]

Quote from smilingsynic:

Yes, there is scientific proof that the creation story in Genesis 1-3 is myth, not reality.

The creation story states that all life on earth was created within a week. Fossil evidence shows otherwise, overwhelmingly.

Human beings did not evolve until around 6 million years ago, hundreds of millions of years after life already appeared on this planet. The fossils in the Burgess shale in British Columbia go back to 530 million years or so.

Simply put, if there was no Adam and Eve, then Christianity cannot possibly be true. No original sin of Adam, no reason for Jesus to die.

At what speed does the earth rotate at today ?

 

[jem]

Quote from stu:

What I agree is proven jem is, whether you like it or not , in certain respects you are atheist and it remains that you still have a lost less coherence in your unintelligent rebuttals than any "atheist wack job" I've ever heard.

says avowed atheist who will not accept definitions from major dictionaries.

 

[stu]

Quote from jem:

says avowed atheist who will not accept definitions from major dictionaries.

main dicitonary definitions
–noun
a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.


.....that's you jem boy !