Quote from range:
WSJ quote: "Messrs. Niederhoffer and Flottl both denied owing Refco any money."
http://www.dailyspeculations.com/vic/refco.html
Quote from range:
WSJ quote: "Messrs. Niederhoffer and Flottl both denied owing Refco any money."
Quote from zdreq:Agreed.
The segregated accounts can indeed be pooled together in order to meet the obligation (debt) of a very large trading blowup.
dude -- and its only taken you until the 50th page on this thread to acknowledge this 'minor' risk at Refco LLC??!)))))))))))
Perhaps it's on the 50th page because it wasn't the problem at Refco. The problem did not have to do with trading losses. It had to do with fraud at the holding company level.
There are all kinds of risks pertaining to futures trading....but not all are applicable in this particular situation.
There doesn't appear to be any customers at Refco with large losses that could create a problem for the other customers. This is primarily a problem at the Holding company level as I understand it, not one that concerns the regulated futures accounts.
Thanks for the numerous informative posts both here and in other threads regarding the Refco situation. Good to see that at least someone pays attention to facts...a rare quality these days.
Now, here's a fact: segregated funds in a futures account can be used to offset a large loss from a single customer. But in this case we do not know that it applies. Therefore, it is not a fact in this particular case.
I would also submit that there is no basis for your view that this fraud had nothing to do with trading losses. We don't know what happened or why it happened. Students of fraud know that frauds often result from losses incurred in trading or other business activity. Most people would not ordinarily commit fraud, but when they are faced with trading or business failures, fraud often becomes a last resort to conceal failure. If they are lucky, this buys them time, until a bad trade moves favorably, or a business recovers, the loss can be repaired, and the secretly "borrowed" funds returned. But sometimes, bad trades become worse trades, so that the money can never be returned. Remember Barings Bank, for example? If this fraud had its origins in the need to conceal huge trading losses in the futures brokerage, or if this company controls trading risks no more effectively than it safeguards against embezzlement of segregated customer funds (for which the Refco futures brokerage Refco, L.L.C. was fined years ago by the CFTC), then segregated customer funds could be seized to cover losses from trading or embezzlement.
It seems that you have the propensity of jumping to conclusions. You've done it here, and you've done it the other thread as well. *** you are jumping to a lot of conclusions on the entire Refco situation. And I think that's the point: some of your conclusions are unsupported by "facts", but are based on mere "supposition" on your part.
October 21, 2005
Refco's Debts Started With Several Clients
Bennett Secretly Intervened To Assume Some Obligations;
Return of Victor Niederhoffer
By DEBORAH SOLOMON, CARRICK MOLLENKAMP, PETER A. MCKAY and JONATHAN WEIL
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
The $430 million in bad debts at the heart of Refco Inc.'s meltdown stemmed from losses by multiple customers, including money manager Victor Niederhoffer, whose hedge fund suffered heavy losses during the 1997 Asian financial crisis, according to people familiar with the matter.
***
The futures brokerage's financial problems may also extend beyond the $430 million, a person familiar with the matter said. This person cautioned that it is too early to gauge the extent of those problems, but that it appeared Refco executives also had manipulated other financial metrics.
***
According to a person familiar with the matter, Refco may have allowed some financially weak customers to take on overly risky positions. While the mechanics of the trades remain unclear, at least some of the customers' problems were tied to margin loans.
Investigators also have turned up evidence that more than one hedge fund was used to help Mr. Bennett hide Refco's losses. Last week, a Summitt, N.J., hedge fund, Liberty Corner Capital Strategy LLC was reported to have been used by Mr. Bennett to conceal the debts. Yesterday, Liberty Corner said it had been told it wasn't the target of the criminal investigation into Refco and that it plans to take legal action against Refco over the matter.
Separately, former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt said he no longer is an outside adviser to Refco. Refco on Oct. 13 announced it had retained Mr. Levitt and former U.S. Comptroller of the Currency Eugene A. Ludwig as special advisers to its board of directors.
***
Quote from iza:
Lets change the direction of this debate
Quote from traderNik:
Actually... let's not.
I was wondering about Apex and the others whose ridiculing of those who voiced their concerns continued even as the latest facts came to light. It now seems clear that a lot of the things that these posters said would/could never happen are actually happening. It's a credibility issue. At first I was with those who said that hell will freeze over before anyone loses money out of a segregated account. I still want to believe it but I don't know for sure. As a trader with a comparatively small account, the outcome of this episode is of extreme interest to me.
I'm not sure that it's time yet to move on from the dissection of what has actually happened at Refco.
Perhaps you can start a new thread if you want to pursue a new line of debate. Maybe you could call it 'Return to Refco?' or something like that. I for one am interested in the responses that may or may not be engendered by jimrockford's last post.
Quote from traderNik:
Actually... let's not.
I was wondering about Apex and the others whose ridiculing of those who voiced their concerns continued even as the latest facts came to light. It now seems clear that a lot of the things that these posters said would/could never happen are actually happening. It's a credibility issue. At first I was with those who said that hell will freeze over before anyone loses money out of a segregated account. I still want to believe it but I don't know for sure. As a trader with a comparatively small account, the outcome of this episode is of extreme interest to me.
Quote from Apex Capital:
From Reuters, Friday, October 21, 7:08PM
Refco's futures brokerage unit is still operating and has not filed for bankruptcy, and one of its key customers, Cargill Inc., said it will continue trading with the business.
Cargill is not alone. Jacob Goldfield, a member of the J.C. Flowers & Co.-led group that has offered to buy the futures unit said customers are now staying with the business and that the client base has stabilized.
Quote from jimrockford:
WSJ confirms that Refcoâs hidden +$400 million receivable was indeed, just as I suspected, the result of lax risk management resulting in customer trading losses in Refco, L.LC., the futures broker, not its parent holding company. These losses were transferred to the parent company as part of a scheme to hide them.