Red States will force rape and incest victims to give birth,parental rights for rapists

[Rams Fan]

Lets go point by point.

What party put the justices in place who ruled in the majority on Dred Scott?

The same party that has now packed the court with 6-3 catholic christo-fascist zealot majority.

US is not a Christian nation. We are a nation where you are free to practice Christianity or any other form of ghost worshiping witchcraft you want to practice. But you are not free to impose your religious beliefs on me and my family.

Look up the "Southern Strategy" and ask yourself which party is aligned with the old civil war jim crow democrats.

Here's a hint: Strom Thurmond.

 

[Rams Fan]

Ricter supports party of the Dred Scott ruling.
Ricter supports party of slavery.
Ricter supports party of KKK.
Ricter supports party of Jim Crow laws.
Ricter supports party of segregation.

Southern strategy - Wikipedia

"Goldwater's position appealed to white Southern Democrats and Goldwater was the first Republican presidential candidate since Reconstruction to win the electoral votes of the Deep South states (Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina) ...In September, Thurmond left the Democratic Party and joined the Republicans. Goldwater gave a televised speech in Columbia, South Carolina, that featured segregationist politicians on-stage with him, including Thurmond, Iris Faircloth Blitch, James F. Byrnes, James H. Gray Sr., Albert Watson, and John Bell Williams, in which he criticized the Civil Rights Act.[72]"

The old white racist southern Democrats are now your contemporary anti-freedom, pro-authoritarian, antiAmerican GOP. Instead of white robes they wear cloaks of phony patriotism and pretend to love America.


Lyndon Johnson describes the GOP and now MAGA's strategy perfectly:

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

— Lyndon Johnson

 

[wildchild]

Pfft, like you set the agenda. Dream on, Karenchild.

In other words, you got owned, foreigner.

 

[wildchild]

The same party that has now packed the court with 6-3 catholic christo-fascist zealot majority.

Incorrect. Do we need to go justice by justice to see what they ruled and what party they were affiliated with?

Dred Scott v. Sandford,[a] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that held the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens.[2][3] The decision is widely considered the worst in the Supreme Court's history, being widely denounced for its overt racism, judicial activism, poor legal reasoning, and crucial role in the start of the American Civil War four years later.[4][5][6] Legal scholar Bernard Schwartz said that it "stands first in any list of the worst Supreme Court decisions". A future chief justice, Charles Evans Hughes, called it the Court's "greatest self-inflicted wound".[7]

In March 1857, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision against Scott. In an opinion written by Chief Justice Roger Taney, the Court ruled that people of African descent "are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution

Taney supported Andrew Jackson's presidential campaigns in 1824 and 1828, and he became a member of Jackson's Democratic Party.

 

[exGOPer]

Incorrect. Do we need to go justice by justice to see what they ruled and what party they were affiliated with?

Dred Scott v. Sandford,[a] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that held the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens.[2][3] The decision is widely considered the worst in the Supreme Court's history, being widely denounced for its overt racism, judicial activism, poor legal reasoning, and crucial role in the start of the American Civil War four years later.[4][5][6] Legal scholar Bernard Schwartz said that it "stands first in any list of the worst Supreme Court decisions". A future chief justice, Charles Evans Hughes, called it the Court's "greatest self-inflicted wound".[7]

In March 1857, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision against Scott. In an opinion written by Chief Justice Roger Taney, the Court ruled that people of African descent "are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution

Taney supported Andrew Jackson's presidential campaigns in 1824 and 1828, and he became a member of Jackson's Democratic Party.

Ya, everyone knows Democrats were the party of conservatives in the 1800s, what has that got to do with 2024?

Is Donald Trump currently a Democrat because he was a Democrat in the past?

 

[Rams Fan]

Incorrect. Do we need to go justice by justice to see what they ruled and what party they were affiliated with?

The education system has failed you.

 

[wildchild]

Ya, everyone knows Democrats were the party of conservatives in the 1800s, what has that got to do with 2024?

Is Donald Trump currently a Democrat because he was a Democrat in the past?

Democrats were the party of racists in the 1850s. Democrats are the party of racists in the 2020s.

Any questions?

 

[Ricter]

In other words, you got owned, foreigner.

Your ignorance is your self-own. We have your post plainly visible, Karenchild.

 

[exGOPer]

Democrats were the party of racists in the 1850s. Democrats are the party of racists in the 2020s.

Any questions?

So Donald Trump is a racist since he was a Democrat?

 

[exGOPer]

Your ignorance is your self-own. We have your post plainly visible, Karenchild.

He is just lying and gaslighting like most conservatives, it's not ignorance - it's malice.