First off I think we can all agree that recovery is an important and often overlooked component of a solid training program, especially as we age. I learned that the hard way last year. You also provide some solid evidence that one does not need to live in the gym to get good, or even great results. Where time management and efficiency are of a concern to someone the programs you suggest provide a viable alternative to the conventionally accepted workout routine. I will say however, IMO, that efficiency and time in the gym isn't always a prime concern for everyone. Good results can be attained through a variety of methods. For an old retired dinosaur like myself I have all the time in the world. I look forward to my gym time. Gives me something to do. I would also think, again just an opinion, that less frequent workouts would require a very clean diet. Those cheat days and meals would have more of a negative impact than for someone who hits the gym more frequently.
I always appreciate reading your opinions and experience on the subject of heath and fitness, and look forward to reading more.
Totally incorrect. Elite athletes recover very quickly, literally in hours and in order for them to maintain or even try to surpass their muscularity and fitness levels, they need to work far harder. Not really a problem since for most of them, it's their job. Beginners have it easy...just turn up at the gym !
...At the top of the tree, elite athletes should be training 12 sessions a week.
Elite athletes are born and then made. They are not just made. There is a genetic component in elite athleticism quite apart from the training required to reach that genetic potential. And so now you are suggesting that everyone should train like genetic anomalies in their physical prime who have exceptional recovery abilities, and in this particular case, CaptainObvious who said he is in his 60s? Seriously? I'm assuming you are in your 20s. Are you training in the manner that you are suggesting that the good Cap'n should?V good...go to the gym everyday if you have the time and energy. Go intense as you can, never to failure...back off immediately if any pain or injury. There will be days in which you feel great and able to be more intense and days in which you just don't have it and you go easier on those days.
Yes. You potentially have a financial incentive to keep people in the gym as long and as often as possible. Thanks for clarifying.I'm a certified Personal Trainer...Is that clearer for you?
Bullshit. I'm still waiting for any solid evidence that 12(!) times a week of intense strength training is optimal for ANYONE, not to mention "for hours a day."Research shows the more advanced you become, the more frequent your workouts should be. The optimal is 12 in a week e.g. 2 sessions a day for 6 days, 1 day rest. Whether any given elite athlete does this, well that's up to them. Do you think Usain Bolt just practices sprinting all day long? He's in the gym strength training for hours a day!
Yes. You potentially have a financial incentive to keep people in the gym as long and as often as possible. Thanks for clarifying.
"
Really? How on earth did you come to that conclusion?
possible lucrative opportunity
Still waiting...I'm still waiting for any solid evidence that 12(!) times a week of intense strength training is optimal for ANYONE, not to mention "for hours a day."
Bullshit. I'm still waiting for any solid evidence that 12(!) times a week of intense strength training is optimal for ANYONE, not to mention "for hours a day."
I was raised on volume training since the mid '70s and trained at upwards of 7.5 hours a week for probably longer than you have been alive. Looking back on it now, you can have it.Btw, the reason why you are advocating low frequency might just be because you don't like to work hard...think about it.