You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Record warm winter because of global cooling
- Thread starter Ricter
- Start date
Hottest January in UAH satellite record
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010
http://climateprogress.org/2010/02/...-satellite-record-roy-spencer-global-warming/
Human-caused global warming easily overwhelms much-hyped "cold snap"
February 5, 2010
http://climateprogress.org/2010/02/...-satellite-record-roy-spencer-global-warming/
The global-average lower tropospheric temperature remained high, at +0.61 deg. C for February, 2010. This is about the same as January, which in our new Version 5.3 of the UAH dataset was +0.63 deg. C. February was second warmest in the 32-year record, behind Feb 1998 which was itself the second warmest of all months.
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/03...obal-temperature-update-version-5-3-unveiled/
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/03...obal-temperature-update-version-5-3-unveiled/
In all seriousness I don't give a crap and neither should anyone who's livelihood that does not depend on the hoax.
Quote from Index piker:
In all seriousness I don't give a crap and neither should anyone who's livelihood that does not depend on the hoax.
Are you aware that the UAH satellite record referred to above is prepared by Spencer and Christie - two of the few AGW skeptical scientists. It seems that the conspiracy has spread so far that even the skeptics are in on the "hoax" as well.
Quote from dcraig:
Are you aware that the UAH satellite record referred to above is prepared by Spencer and Christie - two of the few AGW skeptical scientists. It seems that the conspiracy has spread so far that even the skeptics are in on the "hoax" as well.
You're not listening : the debate is over.
Climate changes, adapt or be an idiot.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to expand their knowledge and improve their understanding. Yet this isn't what happens in global warming skepticism. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet eagerly, even blindly embrace any argument, op-ed piece, blog or study that refutes global warming.
So this website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?
Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to expand their knowledge and improve their understanding. Yet this isn't what happens in global warming skepticism. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet eagerly, even blindly embrace any argument, op-ed piece, blog or study that refutes global warming.
So this website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?
Quote from Free Thinker:
So this website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?
What a bunch of non-sense. That's like questioning discrimination against women and looking for it in peer reviewed women's studies literature.