Record low tornado activity

OK, let's take out the urban stations

ocean-heat-content.gif



Oh, and BTW, note......your "pause in warming since 98"?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

There was never any widespread predictions of more tornadoes. Stronger and more pronounced weather events both hot and cold, dry and wet, but not more tornadoes.

More...
pardon but what exactly do you think causes tornadoes, temper tantrums of nymphs perhaps?

Now if you're predicting uniform warming then of course your are right about the tornadoes except for that prerequisite is EXACTLY WRONG according to observed reality.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

OK, let's take out the urban stations

ocean-heat-content.gif



Oh, and BTW, note......your "pause in warming since 98"?
More...
So there's the ocean temperature chart. I figured the heat had to be going somewhere, unless the physical properties of the CO2 molecule had changed.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yes, thousands of thermometers, satellites, sea bouys, ice cores, tree rings, isotopes and melting ice everywhere has all been fraudulently manipulated.

You are simply fucking crazy.
More...
You don't even have a clue how all that data is collected and combined. You make statements without even looking into how things are computed and possibly manipulated.

If you had any intelligence maybe a light would go on in your mind when reading the links I've presented to you and you would say, "yes, I see."

But, no. You are too ignorant and just come back with blanket ignorant statements like you made last night, "no, I'm right."

LOL Your AGW tail is wagging your dog face. :D
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Yes, thousands of thermometers, satellites, sea bouys, ice cores, tree rings, isotopes and melting ice everywhere has all been fraudulently manipulated.

You are simply fucking crazy.
More...

The problem is that- as demostrated by the East Anglia emails - the data that is collected is deliberately manipulated. Information that does not agree with the previous agreed-upon 'concenus' is deleted, not used, or changed in value.

Never do climate change promoters use the entire data set without manipulation. The classic example is taking station readings representing 2% of the Antarctic land mass and ignoring data from the other 98% while trying to make a case that the ice is melting in the Southern Hemisphere.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

The problem is that- as demostrated by the East Anglia emails - the data that is collected is deliberately manipulated. Information that does not agree with the previous agreed-upon 'concenus' is deleted, not used, or changed in value.

Never do climate change promoters use the entire data set without manipulation. The classic example is taking station readings representing 2% of the Antarctic land mass and ignoring data from the other 98% while trying to make a case that the ice is melting in the Southern Hemisphere.
More...


No the denier bullshit you reference is manipulated data and fraudulent info. There is no fraudulent manipulation of data at NOAA or NASA or any of the other main climatology sources.

You are simply wrong and deluded by right wing denier propaganda. To say that virtually the entire world's science community has been manipulating data and/or are wrong is simply nuts.

But the Koch bros love you guys.
 
Quote from Ricter:

So there's the ocean temperature chart. I figured the heat had to be going somewhere, unless the physical properties of the CO2 molecule had changed.
More...


Why can't these other knuckleheads understand that? It's like they look right past the most obvious because it is counter to their ideology.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top