Quote from Cxinvest:
Speaking of election, go Ron Paul! Give the country back to the people you #*@&$#%# and we wouldn't have these problems.
Quote from arealpissedgoy:
Connect the dots. All indications point to a Hillary win.
She lost Iowa and was going to lose N.H. by a landslide. It would have been over for her after N.H.
However the "Iran boat incidence" hoax was put out a day before the N.H primary voters were heading to the ballot box.
Unlike Obama, Hillary is for all out war. She is the next chosen one because she knows who's boss. The politics of fear is a tried and true technique, they'll use it again.
Quote from Trader5287:
:eek: You must be kidding, no?
If not, don't ever say this if you get invited over to Bush Sr.s' place. Or to the Carters'.
Quote from shamu:
Quote from day7793:
"Recessions have never been detected in America during election years, no matter what these economist can drum up and make you believe."
Your are wrong - Recessions did occur in the 1960 and 1980 election years. In both cases the other party won (Kennedy in 1960 and Reagan in 1980).
The 1990-1991 recession, announced well after the fact, supposedly ended in April 1991. But the unemployment rate continued to rise until spring of 1992, and the weak economy, as felt by the voters was still the main issue when Bush Sr lost to Clinton.
Normally unemployment peaks soon after the end of a recession, but in recent years the government has found ways to change these numbers through creative calculations of "unemployment".
These charts are interesting - the rising unemployment rate says we are already in recession, election year or not.
http://caps.fool.com/blogs/viewpost.aspx?bpid=29223&t=01004553487438585767
Shamu