Quote from kinggyppo:
The thing is when you are younger you are inexperienced so this is how people disqualify you. I think alot of our schooling is backwards that way.
Nowadays you need a college degree to get an interview. With the credit crisis and recession it gives the companies an excuse to hire folks as slave labor. Trading is highly sought after because there are lots of high paying jobs. I think you are better off starting a small business. I wasn't suggesting getting a CFA, being from Chicago, there are alot of successful traders, it used to be where if you had a knack for trading it didn't really matter if you were pedigreed, now though with computers they seem to be looking for quant types that are highly educated. The prop route offers a way to at least get your feet wet and see if it is for you. I mean based on the discussion here it seems like if you aren't at the top of your class you can't get a job in ibanking. Seems like prop is the only way to get in these days.
I'm not too worried on the "quant" front because most new analysts going into a trading floor have a direct master of finance which isn't quite a full masters degree in mathematics.
I was wondering if these prop firms provide a sound quantitative training. I am not sure if a firm that has no quantitative training is worth looking into.
I don't want to be shooting L2 screens and rebate trading and all that stuff. I'd rather pursue other interests.
Any insights into what kind of training programs they have in these prop firms? You work at one kinggy?

