And even though I haven't seen schizo's dick, I am willing to bet its big! Why? Because he's actually doing some great shit in his thread.BTW my dick is pretty sizable as well.![]()
All these guys who claim to be killing it cannot even answer a few simple questions. Do they have to? No. But perhaps by killing it, they are just doing what Schizo is doing, but trading 20 lots. So when schizo is up $300 for the day, they are up $6k for the day.
Do they ever have losing trades? Who knows... they never say. Do they have an 80% win rate? Once again, who knows.
I do really wonder if there is something like the OP suggests, a real edge that has to be kept secret. Its as if to say a trader can put on a few trades a week with a high win rate, load up the contracts, and exit a few days later.
I think the real edge is in the consistency, as has been pointed out elsewhere. Claiming you have an edge really should come with some metric. If you go back to a poster who shared some good numbers years ago, lescor, you will see that his average win and average loss wasn't actually that dissimilar from schizo. To make 500k, he probably lost about 300k (can't remember the exact numbers). This of course means that his wins were 800k, losses, 300k, and 500k net. When you see Schizo's results, his average win and average loss is usually 1-2 points apart.
Now is this an edge? Sure its a statistical edge and easy to see how the money adds up, but this isn't the mythical edge that seems to be suggested by posters who never say much. This type of edge I don't think exists, unless of course you're talking inside info. I'd love to be proven wrong, and clearly no one will ever say, but I think its important to recognize the importance of a slightly bigger win over a slightly smaller loss executed over and over again.

