Read Cohen's testimony here

1QPlkwA.png
 
Also important to this Republican line of questioning, Cohen was finance chairman of the RNC before Mueller pulled up on him.

Has any of the Congress asked anything along this line yet? Haven’t had a chance to keep up but this looks like the Dems aren’t really doing a good job, imo, and republicans are just disgraceful.
 
Hillary Clinton's closest confidante- Lanny Davis- sits there serving as Cohen's attorney.

Coincidence?

Let the viewers decide.

Let’s see, when Trump is attempting to intimidate and smear you who would be the best lawyer to represent you?

This must be soooo hard to figure out why Cohen would use one of Clinton’s attorneys.
 
Damn, I’m mad I missed this, Meadows pulled out Trump’s wedding planner to prove he is not racist??? Wtf?

That is some wild stuff. I can’t believe this lady allowed herself to be a prop like that.

Also, why is she wearing AOC’s jacket?

5C54866E-6509-48D2-A3F8-3BF2A4CF3249.jpeg
 
Mr. Trump’s personal lawyers reviewed and edited my statement to Congress about the timing of the Moscow Tower negotiations before I gave it.

This would seem to have the potential to open a new can of worms with regard to the President's indirect, via his attorneys, participation in Cohen's testimony unless the edits were not substantive with regard to facts.
 
Last edited:
Damn, I’m mad I missed this, Meadows pulled out Trump’s wedding planner to prove he is not racist??? Wtf?

That is some wild stuff. I can’t believe this lady allowed herself to be a prop like that.

Also, why is she wearing AOC’s jacket?

View attachment 198397
A more or less constant annoyance for the rest of us, it seems, is the lack of intellect among Republicans in general. So while Trump's base sees Republican grandstanding as a brilliant defense of their genius President, the rest of us are thinking WTF, have these folks lost their fucking minds!
 
This would seem to have the potential to open a new can of worms with regard to the President's indirect, via his attorney's, participation in Cohen's testimony unless the edits were not substantive with regard to facts.

I would disagree. Having attorneys edit testimony for dates, timeline, and content seems to be a common thing in Congressional testimony. It is a normal practice to have your testimony reviewed before giving it -- the bottom line is that YOU will be responsible for any false statements under oath -- not any legal advisors involved in the preparation.
 
Back
Top