I am sure my journey in trading is similar to many of my fellow ET'rs. Over the years I have slowly addressed certain facets of trading and gnawed at them until I was at peace with something that worked for me, that I could fully embrace.
One aspect that I still struggle with is whether or not to re-enter a trade if my initial stop gets hit, then it seems to be going back in the direction I was playing.
We all know the felling of being stopped just before a big run, and in the back of my mind that scenario keeps trying to force its way into my actions. I contrast that with the old adage "that the best trades are good from the beginning". I have not done a statistical study of what percentage of trades do reverse after a stop and whould have been good for re-entry, vs those in which if I had re-entered would have stopped me twice.
I am tending in my trading to not do any re-entries of a specific setup.
The reason is based partly on the above, and partly on knowing myself. If I get stopped , then ok. The market just told me that it is thinking larger than the risks I am willing to take.
If price hesitates and seems to be going back in my original direction and I hit it again, I am knowingly entering into a trade that has already removed it'self from those that are "good from the beginning" so to some degree that trade has already become a higher risk trade.
If I get stopped a second time, my revenge response starts to wake up, and I find that it knocks me off center, makes me more likely to stretch my rules a bit, and often often will lead to a third loss, which I can accept when I play by my rules, but feel very frustrated with myself when I can track it back to a re-entry.
I would like to hear other views on this, as I sometimes have a hard time getting out of my box.
BMW
One aspect that I still struggle with is whether or not to re-enter a trade if my initial stop gets hit, then it seems to be going back in the direction I was playing.
We all know the felling of being stopped just before a big run, and in the back of my mind that scenario keeps trying to force its way into my actions. I contrast that with the old adage "that the best trades are good from the beginning". I have not done a statistical study of what percentage of trades do reverse after a stop and whould have been good for re-entry, vs those in which if I had re-entered would have stopped me twice.
I am tending in my trading to not do any re-entries of a specific setup.
The reason is based partly on the above, and partly on knowing myself. If I get stopped , then ok. The market just told me that it is thinking larger than the risks I am willing to take.
If price hesitates and seems to be going back in my original direction and I hit it again, I am knowingly entering into a trade that has already removed it'self from those that are "good from the beginning" so to some degree that trade has already become a higher risk trade.
If I get stopped a second time, my revenge response starts to wake up, and I find that it knocks me off center, makes me more likely to stretch my rules a bit, and often often will lead to a third loss, which I can accept when I play by my rules, but feel very frustrated with myself when I can track it back to a re-entry.
I would like to hear other views on this, as I sometimes have a hard time getting out of my box.
BMW