Appears that Rice is the victim of the NFL trying to appease the PC crowd. Of course the PC crowd will take that statement and claim I'm defending what Rice did. Nonsense!
Here's the issue. When Rice committed this offense, the NFL had no policy to address it. In a feeble attempt to do something they gave Rice a 2 week suspension. Okay, that isn't much more than a slap on the hands and people let them know that. On 8/28 the league unveiled there new policy to address this issue. In a nutshell it goes like this. You hit a woman, you get a 6 week suspension for a first offense. 2nd offense you get a lifetime ban, but are allowed to apply for reinstatement after one year. Like it, don't like it, not the issue. That is their written policy going forward.
So my question is, assuming you want to apply this new policy retroactively, should not Rice be getting a 6 week suspension? Why the indefinite ban from the league? Here's why. The NFL is pulling a PR stunt in an effort to cover up their piss poor handling of this event to begin with. So the way I see it, the NFL still has no clear policy. You would think that the league union would step up and ask some questions. Instead they've abandon Rice because they're scared to death of the blowback. Pussies! Either the league has a policy or they don't. What is the policy?
Now as far as what I think should have happened to begin with. Rice does time for assault and never plays football again. Simple as that.