There's absolutely no difference between Fed actions (which in many cases during the crisis were outside of laws) and allowing PR to go bankrupt. It's just that one saves the creditors and banks, and the other the people. Given that differential, I'd argue that laws should exist to protect people more than they do the financial sector.
You sound like Elizabeth Warren.
I'm not supporting bailouts of banks or anyone else. All I'm saying is we should tread carefully when we are advocating passing laws that suddenly cut creditors off at the knees. I thought the way Obama ran roughshod over creditors in the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies was very unfair, but it was an omen of his general approach to the law and constitutional limits.
It's not like PR can't go into default on the bonds. Then it becomes a matter of restructuring them or litigation.