First off, you never mention exactly WHICH of these "official" government reports you are citing. Just some arbitrary reference to non-specified data that all the big honcho's supposedly use to forecast their economic outlook. Secondly, the fact that you need to constantly give us your "qualifications" weakens your argument...Finally, if all of your "official" numbers exclude food & energy, well then the numbers are b.s. and not worth a damn.
If we are in such a low inflation environment, then why is there such a strong movement to DOUBLE the minimum wage? It couldn't be that rents are skyrocketing, food costs are soaring amidst a whole sort of other cost increases (medical, property taxes, tuition prices).
Now, I imagine that you are going to make the academic argument that inflation cannot be a concern without wage growth...well, that's yesterdays news...doesn't apply any longer with a Fed hellbent on reflating asset prices regardless of the collateral damage to the real economy.
Yep, unfortunately Sig doesn't live in the real world...The "official numbers" can't be wrong, we must all be conspiracy kooks since we can't see all of that deflation all around us.
I said I'd come back when I figured out a way to make money of this crowds ability to completely convince themselves that the official inflation numbers are wrong without being able to provide a single number to back up their point. So, I'd like to propose a bilateral forward contract. These are not regulated, unlike futures contracts. It will work this way. On Oct 1st, my counterparty(s) goes to three of their local supermarkets and takes pictures of the prices of a basket of 10 staple foods. We'll say milk, sugar, flour, potatoes, beans, rice, eggs, butter, cheese, and vegetable oil. You send me the pictures of those prices. I'll do the same (I live in a medium size east coast suburban area, and yes, my wife and I alternate weeks to do grocery shopping for our family that is decidedly not in the top 1% of wage earners). Exactly one year later we go to the same stores and take pictures of the prices for those exact same items, same brand, size, etc. All pictures get posted here. We compare the percentage change in prices to the unadjusted percentage change in prices for those commodity classes at
http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1508.pdf If the average actual prices you and I photographed increased at a rate 5% greater or more than the official CPI rate for those classes, I pay you $1,000 and make a post that the evidence has forced me to believe the official CPI numbers are a conspiracy and I'll never defend them here again. Anything else, you pay me $1,000, and post here that the evidence has forced you to believe the official CPI numbers are not a conspiracy and you'll never post unsubstantiated assertions that official numbers are lies because you say they are here again. I'm happy to put a contract together for anyone who's willing to put their money where their mouth is.
Several posters have claimed rampant inflation in staple goods and are just certain the federal government is fabricating inflation numbers in a significant way. If you're sure the federal government is lying and understating inflation by a significant amount, this is free money for you.
I want to be clear that at this point I'm simply trying to debunk the persistent, completely irrational insistence by the conspiracy theorists that the official CPI numbers are completely faked, nothing else. I've asked for just a shred of quantitative evidence that this is the case and all I got back was the assertion that 1 percenters are hoarding 5 pound sacks of sugar! It doesn't get more "real world" than pictures in your local supermarket, are you up for it der_kommissar, eurusdzn, k p, spacewiz, Tsing Tao?