Quote from dpt:
This, referring to the death marches that were ordered, when it became clear
that the `master race' was going to lose the war, despite their obvious
genetic superiority, and that a likely consequence, if there were any
survivors of the Vernichtungs-Lagern, was that the larger world would come to
understand the magnitude of the crime that was committed.
Now, speaking of the Holocaust, I am no authority about the Holocaust, but I do have a healthy skeptical mindset. In the Washington Times of Monday, I read a big article"Archives detail horrors of Nazi death marches". Well, it says here that they ordered 20,000 prisoners transfered from Buchenwald to Dachau, noting that the other camps were "overcrowed". This was at the very end of the war. Well, I guess my immediate question here is 'if the Nazis were so determent to slaughter 6 million Jews, why were the other camps overcrowed if there has been this massive policy to murder jews in a systematic version by the German government? It says "In the 1944-1945 winter the Nazis began emptying the concentration camps and destroying their records. Partly to cover up their crimes.". And yet now, we are hearing in other reports that there are massive numbers of German records, that are still in existance, which detail the "Mechanism of Death" as they put it. Well, either the records are there or they were destroyed. Now, I am getting confused. I hear in January of 1945 they report 60,000 prisoners were herded in groups, several thousand at a time, from the Auschwitz extermination camp to march westwards. Now, that's a lot of work. To transfer 60,000 people. Now, if Auschwitz was an extermination camp, it seems to me that if it was so effective as we have been repeatetly told, then the Germans would have had a very easy time in shooting or gassing or burning 60,000 people if their process was such a machine of death as we are being told. Now see, these are just little items in a very long story, and I look at them, and it just seems to me that there are some contradictions here.
Just in your basic news stories, you can start reading things into them and realise that there is much more to it, but you know, if I were to make these comments on German, Swiss, or Canadian soil - I could go to jail for saying these things. That's why we have to be concerned about the first amentment. They are determined to put an end to the first amentment. They are determined to put an end to freedom of speech. They are determined to prevent us from investigating further. Many, many issues. Not just the Holocaust, and I don't even mean to focus on the Holocaust.
I think to get a really good idea on what this is all about, you should get the book "Night" by Elie Wiesel. Published in 1946 or 47. His claims are that at Auschwitz, they weren't Gassed nor shot or electrocuted, they didn't have diesel engines going in a room to kill them. His claims are that they had burning pits were Jews were thrown in and burned alive. And not only that, he also claims that they had a smaller pit for the children. The interesting thing about his book it that it has been reprinted in several languages, and the various editions of his book in different languages are completely different, strangely enough. Also, keep in mind that Mr. Wiesels book contradicts many other books by survivers.