Has anyone read the randomwalktrading books? If so, could you comment on them?
Thanks,
Harry
Thanks,
Harry
Quote from nazzdack:
Institutional underachievers believe in "random walk" as a way of rationalizing away their mediocrity. Overachievers know it's BS.
Quote from nazzdack:
Institutional underachievers believe in "random walk" as a way of rationalizing away their mediocrity. Overachievers know it's BS.
), when properly implemented, will smoke them.Quote from HoundDogOne:
"Overachievers" overcome random markets is various ways:
(1) Trading on inside information is very common.
(2) Market manipulation by hedge funds, market makers, and Specialists is very common. Soros is Exhibit A.
(3) Very close proximity... millisecond proximity... allows Big Players to exploit "inside position" in the markets...
Such as front-running, etc.
(4) A lot of money is made in niches and very complex securities.
Quote from HoundDogOne:
I'm an overachiever... and it's not BS.
"Random walk" really means... financial markets are "too efficient" to exploit.
All very liquid securities are "too efficient" to exploit (99% random)...
Many isolated or complex market niches are quite inefficient... and are profitable (80% random).
"Overachievers" overcome random markets is various ways:
(1) Trading on inside information is very common.
(2) Market manipulation by hedge funds, market makers, and Specialists is very common. Soros is Exhibit A.
(3) Very close proximity... millisecond proximity... allows Big Players to exploit "inside position" in the markets...
Such as front-running, etc.
(4) A lot of money is made in niches and very complex securities.
But the above in no way mitigates the reality of "near random" markets...
And from the amateur perspective of 95% of the people here...
The markets are a "random walk" = "too efficient to exploit".