I don't write about the market. I don't really write my analysis on here. I don't explain my methodologies too much, even though I've written enough to give you a good idea of my style. Why? Simply because for people reading this journal(if there are any... don't bother with the "I do" posts....
) it doesn't matter.
I have my own style of trading and you most likely do too, or should have one. So technically, no matter how much those vendors try, it doesn't really matter. It all comes down to how you think.
Here's an example. Based on cycle analysis, when the shorter time framed MA crossing over the longer time framed MA represents a top for the actual chart. (Short = 1/2 time of cycle and long being time of full cycle). Depending on the market situation, I would interpret it as a reversal signal. But generally, crossing up of a shorter MA trend confirmation.
This is technical interpretation of the MA based on the cycle analysis' standpoint. Knowledge from study and research alters interpretation.
Another example. I've created a adaptive MACD system a while back. It had great system performance, I traded it without picking signals out and it worked better than my volatility breakout system. Still, once I started picking signals out, I under-performed both the system itself but also the general performance under the previous signals or system. System itself was good but it didn't help me get in sync with the market. Generally, a better system should be traded but because of my discretional style I let it aside.
Personal style and psychological and mental characteristics does alters interpretation.
) it doesn't matter.I have my own style of trading and you most likely do too, or should have one. So technically, no matter how much those vendors try, it doesn't really matter. It all comes down to how you think.
Here's an example. Based on cycle analysis, when the shorter time framed MA crossing over the longer time framed MA represents a top for the actual chart. (Short = 1/2 time of cycle and long being time of full cycle). Depending on the market situation, I would interpret it as a reversal signal. But generally, crossing up of a shorter MA trend confirmation.
This is technical interpretation of the MA based on the cycle analysis' standpoint. Knowledge from study and research alters interpretation.
Another example. I've created a adaptive MACD system a while back. It had great system performance, I traded it without picking signals out and it worked better than my volatility breakout system. Still, once I started picking signals out, I under-performed both the system itself but also the general performance under the previous signals or system. System itself was good but it didn't help me get in sync with the market. Generally, a better system should be traded but because of my discretional style I let it aside.
Personal style and psychological and mental characteristics does alters interpretation.