Rand Paul: "Trump Derangement Syndrome" Has Gone Over The Top And People Have Lost The Big Picture

[Arnie]

I had to put that asshole on ignore.
Assuming he was consistently +80% profitable trading futures since 2014, no real trader would be dumb enough to brag about it. They'd know that other traders just wouldn't believe them. What kind of person does that? Pathetic is the only word that comes to mind.

 

[Slartibartfast]

I think I blocked Arnie first there though.. just I could see his blank reply due to the bug. I blocked your first Arnie. Na-na.

I had to put that asshole on ignore.
Assuming he was consistently +80% profitable trading futures since 2014, no real trader would be dumb enough to brag about it. They'd know that other traders just wouldn't believe them. What kind of person does that? Pathetic is the only word that comes to mind.

One doing it intentionally to bug Poindexter hehehehe And it works!

Does not ONE 'righty' here know how futures scalping works?

Is Arnie yet another old man on ET who takes the odd stock trade and thinks that is serious trading? Dunning Kruger effect prevents him from realizing there is more? So he thinks +80% is trading stocks not futures as that is all he can conceive? Does he know that Max E. said he consistently traded +75%? and that is perfectly normal/necessary to make a profit?

Be careful Arnie or I'll post my dick picks, that will make you really upset.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Ok here is the first one for Arnie who probably does not have me on ignore because I had him on it first so.. what triggered him? Massive Dick Pick.

 

[elderado]

https://tomluongo.me/2018/07/24/joker-hitler-burglar-spy-four-stages-trump/

 

[jem]

When the tds lefties talk about election interference... what at they claiming is a fact?
and could they link to those facts.

for instance the way I see things...

I don't consider social media trolling criminal election interference. (the rabid foreign trolls here like exgoper, tony and slarti would have to agree otherwise they are admitting they are criminals.)
I don't consider hacking into hillary's server election interference, I consider that illegal but expected hacking.
I don't consider phishing podesta email account election inteference its hacking.
Maybe releasing podesta emails could be called election interference but again exposing corruption is a good thing.

Hacking the vote would be election interference.
So when Rand Paul equivocated a bit on the subject of election interference he was being responsible.