Rand Paul tea party nut goes wild, stomped on woman's head for demonstrating

Quote from bugscoe:

UNHINGED LEFTIST Who Lunged at Rand Paul Is Paid Far Left Activist
Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, October 26, 2010, 5:47 AM

For the record…
The Unhinged Leftist Who Lunged at Rand Paul Is a Paid Activist

MoveOn.org contract employee Lauren Valle stalked and lunged at Rand Paul outside the final debate last night.

Valle, from Falmouth, Massachusetts, was tackled and stepped on by Paul supporters. (TPM)

The media will make this far left activist out to be a martyr today. We already know that.
It certainly was over the line to put a shoe on her shoulder or head.

But, Lauren knew exactly what she was doing.
She’s had plenty of practice. She’s a professional leftist activist.


Lauren was booked in May on felony charges. (LPSO)

Lauren protested oil companies in Louisiana during the BP oil spill. (Telegraph)

Luaren Valle was charged with the felony charges of Unauthorized Entry of a Critical Infrastructure and Unauthorized Entry of an Inhabited Dwelling in May.

Lauren vandalized a ship in May.



(REUTERS/Greenpeace)

Which is why we know the whole thing was a staged event for the media to run with. Another example of the radical left trying to manipulate elections through their friends in media. They're hoping and praying some will get shot, and eventually someone will. That's our MSM at work.
 
Ricter is a proponent of a marxist invention called "critical theory" . The summary of "critical theory" is that any argument or action which supports left wing or marxist causes is "rational", while any argument or action which critisizes them is "irrational".

Quote from Ricter:

That's what the perps of violence always say and have always said.
 
Whenever these things happen it's always the right coming out with how tough they are, how many guns they've got, their ammo supply, how ready they are, etc. They're itching for a fight. My point at the beginning of this is that neither political philosophy has a monopoly on "throwing the first punch".

As for "it's probably true", sure, Lucrum, sure. Christ had it coming. Etc.
 
Quote from Ricter:

Whenever these things happen it's always the right coming out with how tough they are, how many guns they've got, their ammo supply, how ready they are, etc. They're itching for a fight. My point at the beginning of this is that neither political philosophy has a monopoly on "throwing the first punch".

As for "it's probably true", sure, Lucrum, sure. Christ had it coming. Etc.

youre comparing this lauren vaule chick to christ?
 
Quote from Tsing Tao:

youre comparing this lauren vaule chick to christ?

No, I'm arguing that "probably" may not be true, by presenting an absurd counter example. Since exceptions to "probably" exist, then it means that the current incident may or may not be justified, ie. it's open for discussion.

The perps of violence always think they're "right", regardless of the issue in question.
 
Agreed. Politics and beauracracy are the culprits. The solution? As little beauracracy and as little government as is feasibly possible.


Quote from Ricter:

My point at the beginning of this is that neither political philosophy has a monopoly on "throwing the first punch".
 
Quote from Ricter:

...As for "it's probably true", sure, Lucrum, sure. Christ had it coming. Etc.
He did according to the Jews at the time.
 
Back
Top