Sweden.
But, that's not the point. The point is, with our resources, we can do much more.
Race
- Thread starter Pa(b)st Prime
- Start date
Sweden.
But, that's not the point. The point is, with our resources, we can do much more.
LOL. You missed the part where I pointed out that 95% of us are on the take, and most of us want even more. All 18 people that think smaller government is good or a fair tax is great can yell and scream and demand all we want - it'll have even less effect than the troothers demanding another 9/11 investigation.
I mean, even if a lot of people went nuts and demanded it, nothing real would happen. The politicians make their bread and butter by caving to special interests. Asking them to give it up is like asking Ted Kennedy to abstain from booze and broads.
Not gonna happen. It's even more unlikely than an Algore nomination. The argument about whether government should be bigger or smaller is kaput. Now we argue about how much bigger it should be (only twice as big, or even more).
What is interesting about the genetics question is that whites can lay claim to higher IQ than some other groups, but the irony is that the ideal physical image of the white person is genetically recessive across the board.
In time, blonde hair and blue eyes will be as rare as a white buffalo.
If all people become dark hair and dark skin, than no one can blame white people for problems. This is when people will be responsible for their own actions and behavior.
This is the second time making your point. And I wonder why you think it is significant?
If as evolutionists seem to insist our common ancestors sprung from a man in africa and slowly man adapted to colder climates and developed lighter skin and eyes - wouldn't you expect those traits to be recessive. Heck it was probably hard for those traits to appear at all. I would call them powerful rather than weak and expect them to have some sort of genetic will to survive.
It is significant because it is THE lynchpin of white racism. White racists are fond of telling half(or less) of the genetic story. I admire the Nordic will to survive, but if it comes at the expense to the rest of the planet, then it is best to breed them out of existence.
The will to survive comes from the reality that if they breed with anyone other than one of a identical genetic profile, the very thing that sets them apart is eliminated.
The sooner this kind of elitism is removed the better for the globe.
That is my point.
I look forward to that day.
Paying for someone to sit on their arse is a pain in mine
Quote from Almond_Dragoon:
I look forward to that day.
Paying for someone to sit on their arse is a pain in mine
What I am saying is if all people become dark hair and dark eyed, then to blame white people for problems will not happen. But there will still be problems. So who will be to blame then? Do you think just because people will look physically the same that some won't have more than others? I don't. It will be about who is the most productive and creative, they will have more because they worked for it.
Maybe so, then that would be a step backward to reward by who a person is and not what they are capable of.