Quote from Yannis:
I really sympathize with those in need. Yet, there's a fine line to walk, an important balance to keep, between helping (temporarily) someone in need, and creating a whole class of people who take that help for granted and use it to justify their unwillingness to work hard like those whose taxes pay for that help. I can help my daughter with her homework here and there, but, if I end up doing it for her regularly, I'd be hurting her in the long run.
Yes, everyone needs help sometimes. If too much help is given, there is no reason for someone to find ways to survive, becasue the way to survive is given to them.
For the women who was creative enough to find a way to save thousands of dollars by rationing money from welfare, but then her savings was taken away, this is a problem with the welfare system that does not promote independence, but keeps people down. Welfare system should award people who manage to save some of that money they are given. Maybe welfare should say they will match any savings a person can save, and apply it to an education for her children. Then those children will not follow the generation before them and be on welfare.
Why should anyone on welfare save money if they can, when it will be taken from them if they do? No incentive for welfare people to do better.