Quinnipiac Poll: Con Man near record low, voters trust media over Con Man

[exGOPer]

Yes, yes, "dumb con, ignorant con..." we've heard it numerous times from you. We get it, it's boring now.

No, I specifically stated it was enough for me to warrant caution. Never said I had evidence of anything. that's why I asked you, once again, if you were Wagner. I see you've, again, refused to answer.

Bam.

Ya ya, nobody insults anyone here, I was the first one to ever unparlimentary language in this echo chamber.

And why the fuck would I indulge in your conspiracy theories, it's like asking, are you the son of a whore I fucked back in the 90's, it doesn't even deserve a response. You were a moderator right? Go ask your old pal's to confirm your delusion, why are you bothering me with your shit.

 

[fhl]

LOL, the circlejerk has confirmed the conspiracy theory!! Believe what you want, the guy apparently worked for Tudor and you are insulting him, must be a swell guy, you are free to call me whatever fantasies you have.

And by the way, it's hilarious that you go on about 'evidence' when it comes to Trump collusion but an ad hominem attack by fellow right wingers is enough for you to confirm your delusions. Integrity is one thing I have never seen in a right winger.

You just attempted to persuade that it wasn't you that posted that business card that you know you posted,

and then you claim you've never seen integrity in a right winger.

Project much?

 

[Tsing Tao]

Ya ya, nobody insults anyone here, I was the first one to ever unparlimentary language in this echo chamber.

And why the fuck would I indulge in your conspiracy theories, it's like asking, are you the son of a whore I fucked back in the 90's, it doesn't even deserve a response. You were a moderator right? Go ask your old pal's to confirm your delusion, why are you bothering me with your shit.

Given I was born well before the 90s, that would be rather impossible, regardless of the promiscuity of my mother during that decade. But you're Wagner, that much I'm sure of - even without evidence. Wonder why you're so against admitting that, it's like you're embarrassed to be who you are.

IPs can be changed and are frequently, so comparing them would yield nothing at all.

 

[exGOPer]

You just attempted to persuade that it wasn't you that posted that business card that you know you posted,

and then you claim you've never seen integrity in a right winger.

Project much?

Again, who cares what you believe or what you call me that I will try to persuade you. Call me Mike, Wagner or Beethoven, I could care less what some deluded right winger thinks of me. I posted a business card? Maybe get Trump's Hawaiian PI's on the case, only they can find the truth.

 

[fhl]

I posted a business card? .

Yes. While using the landis82 alias.

And that's a fact.

 

[exGOPer]

Given I was born well before the 90s, that would be rather impossible, regardless of the promiscuity of my mother during that decade. But you're Wagner, that much I'm sure of - even without evidence. Wonder why you're so against admitting that, it's like you're embarrassed to be who you are.

IPs can be changed and are frequently, so comparing them would yield nothing at all.

Why would I admit to to your bullshit that I don't even know where you are getting from, and if you are sure then so be it - call me whatever you want, not my problem to entertain your delusions.

And it says a lot that you don't even want to investigate, I get what you are doing, trolling me so I get angry and you can get me banned. Try harder Con.

 

[exGOPer]

Yes. While using the landis82 alias.

And that's a fact.

LOL, a Trump supporting Con talking about facts.

If you are so sure, let's have a wager, your friend Tao ran away, maybe you are man enough?

 

[Tsing Tao]

Why would I admit to to your bullshit that I don't even know where you are getting from, and if you are sure then so be it - call me whatever you want, not my problem to entertain your delusions.

And it says a lot that you don't even want to investigate, I get what you are doing, trolling me so I get angry and you can get me banned. Try harder Con.

Banned? Why would I want to ban you when you bring such hilarity to the forum??

If someone said to me, hey are you "John Smith" and I wasn't, I'd just say "I'm not John Smith". The only conceivable reason for not answering would be if I was, indeed, that person.

 

[exGOPer]

Banned? Why would I want to ban you when you bring such hilarity to the forum??

If someone said to me, hey are you "John Smith" and I wasn't, I'd just say "I'm not John Smith". The only conceivable reason for not answering would be if I was, indeed, that person.

Oh please, everytime I post something counter to circlejerk you get triggered and try to shut me down.

And if you are so sure that I am that guy, let's have a wager - you can remain anonymous, wire the money to Barron and I will reveal my identity to him. Deal? Or you gonna run away like a pussy just like the last time? LOL

 

[Tsing Tao]

Oh please, everytime I post something counter to circlejerk you get triggered and try to shut me down.

Please show just one instance where I've tried to ban you. Just one.

And if you are so sure that I am that guy, let's have a wager - you can remain anonymous, wire the money to Barron and I will reveal my identity to him. Deal? Or you gonna run away like a pussy just like the last time? LOL

How is Baron going to identify who you are if you don't want him to?