Quinnipiac Poll: Con Man near record low, voters trust media over Con Man

exGOPer said:
If you don't care then what's with your bullshit conspiracy theories? Some idiot who I don't remember posted some shit because he was a snowflake and who has since disappeared (riskarb outed him as a losing trader long ago) is your basis for peddling inane BS? Why don't you go to Baron and confirm using IP addresses if I am the same person if you are so curious? LOL. You think I give a shit about what a bunch of old right wingers think about me?

And nice excuses coward, make more excuses to act like a weasel just like your messiah organtuan. Just peddle insults and conspiracy theories online, when the time comes to act, disappear making silly excuses.
More...

What conspiracy theory am I peddling again?
 
Tsing Tao said:
Ah, I never saw Leapup's post. Was it in line with Mav's?
More...


Waggie outed his name himself. He posted a pic of a business card from when he worked for tudor jones to prove he worked there. I think that pic was taken down pretty quickly.

At this point his real name was outed and leapup just did the extra investigation to find out more about him and found it on social media, which included a pic. And he posted it. That was probably removed, too.

Anyway, that's some real info in addition to what mav posted, which i guess you could call hearsay, but it seems to be in line with everything we know about him.
 
fhl said:
Waggie outed his name himself. He posted a pic of a business card from when he worked for tudor jones to prove he worked there. I think that pic was taken down pretty quickly.

At this point his real name was outed and leapup just did the extra investigation to find out more about him and found it on social media, which included a pic. And he posted it. That was probably removed, too.

Anyway, that's some real info in addition to what mav posted, which i guess you could call hearsay, but it seems to be in line with everything we know about him.
More...

But somehow this is a "conspiracy theory". He was apparently that old moniker "Landis82" or something. The same guy who used to pester me over and over again about aliases on this site when I was a moderator. I'd get a private message weekly about him trying to uncover "Port1544" or whatever that guy's name was. Meanwhile he has a ton of aliases himself.
 
exGOPer said:
Right nothing at all, maybe it's not just Trump but his base suffering from Alzheimer's
More...

Apparently you've outed yourself, from what fhl says. Do you deny that you are Michael Wagner? I've asked you several times now and you won't answer. If it was really untrue, why wouldn't you just say "hell no"? That person means absolutely spit to me, I'm just curious why you wouldn't admit it.
 
Tsing Tao said:
Apparently you've outed yourself, from what fhl says. Do you deny that you are Michael Wagner? I've asked you several times now and you won't answer. If it was really untrue, why wouldn't you just say "hell no"? That person means absolutely spit to me, I'm just curious why you wouldn't admit it.
More...

LOL, the circlejerk has confirmed the conspiracy theory!! Believe what you want, the guy apparently worked for Tudor and you are insulting him, must be a swell guy, you are free to call me whatever fantasies you have.

And by the way, it's hilarious that you go on about 'evidence' when it comes to Trump collusion but an ad hominem attack by fellow right wingers is enough for you to confirm your delusions. Integrity is one thing I have never seen in a right winger.
 
exGOPer said:
LOL, the circlejerk has confirmed the conspiracy theory!! Believe what you want, the guy apparently worked for Tudor and you are insulting him, must be a swell guy, you are free to call me whatever fantasies you have.

And by the way, it's hilarious that you go on about 'evidence' when it comes to Trump collusion but an ad hominem attack by fellow right wingers is enough for you to confirm your delusions. Integrity is one thing I have never seen in a right winger.
More...

Yes, yes, "dumb con, ignorant con..." we've heard it numerous times from you. We get it, it's boring now.

No, I specifically stated it was enough for me to warrant caution. Never said I had evidence of anything. that's why I asked you, once again, if you were Wagner. I see you've, again, refused to answer.

Bam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top