Quote from atticus:
What's your C2 handle?
Practically we changed the name of this very 1st system with C2 almost every two weeks. The last time was after reading your post above.
We would like to prove several options-based systems/ideas, but there are certain limitations with C2 (or Covestor), such as options on futures is not available (for Crude Oil!).
Each real-money account would probably require say $100,000 per system in order to prove the performance of a particular system. We don't like to set up too many separate accounts at the same time (including too many log-on screens) for all the systems/ideas that we really want to test concurrently. Finally we realised C2 is a good platform for our planned experiments.
BTW, wish you do well with your software business.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3401123#post3401123
Quote from atticus:
The question is whether I have created a piece of software that is 100% objective and consistently profitable, which I have. You are absolutely right I will not accept your conditions because it is childish and off point. If you canât afford to outlay a few hundred dollars to test a multi-million dollar piece of software then that is your loss. I think your testing the software would have been a benefit for you seeing that a regional $250M hedge fund has been testing it for the last 60 days with such outstanding returns he ordered a copy for each of his 12 traders. He told me he paid for all 10 copies of the software the 2nd week he tested it.
:
as a tracking system) a Jan21 SPY 126 Call @ $2.44.